Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 May 8;29(2):586-596. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00045. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
Purpose The aim of this research study was to examine common practices of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who work with children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with respect to whether or not SLPs consider processing differences in ASD or the effects of input during their instruction. Method Following a qualitative research method, how SLPs instruct and present augmentative and alternative communication systems to individuals with ASD, their rationale for method selection, and their perception of the efficacy of selected interventions were probed. Semistructured interviews were conducted as part of an in-depth case report with content analysis. Results Based on completed interviews, 4 primary themes were identified: (a) , (b) , (c) , and (d) . Additionally, one secondary theme, , was identified Conclusions Clinicians reported making decisions based on the needs of the child; however, they also reported making decisions based on the diagnostic category that characterized the child (i.e., ASD). The use of modeling when teaching augmentative and alternative communication to individuals with ASD emerged as a theme, but variations in the method of modeling were noted. SLPs did not report regularly considering processing differences in ASD, nor did they consider the effects of input during instruction.
目的 本研究旨在探讨从事自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童工作的言语语言病理学家(SLP)的常见做法,即 SLP 们在教学中是否考虑 ASD 的加工差异或输入的影响。 方法 采用定性研究方法,探究 SLP 如何指导和呈现自闭症个体的辅助和替代性沟通系统、他们选择方法的理由以及他们对所选干预措施效果的看法。作为深入案例报告的一部分进行了半结构化访谈,并进行了内容分析。 结果 根据完成的访谈,确定了 4 个主要主题:(a)、(b)、(c)和(d)。此外,还确定了一个次要主题,即。 结论 临床医生报告说他们根据孩子的需求做出决策;然而,他们也根据描述孩子的诊断类别(即 ASD)做出决策。在教授自闭症个体辅助和替代性沟通时使用建模的方法作为一个主题出现,但在建模方法上存在差异。SLP 们并没有报告经常考虑 ASD 的加工差异,也没有考虑教学过程中的输入效果。