Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd (ESR), Porirua 5240, New Zealand.
The School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, 660 S College Ave, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA; The Biodesign Institute Center for Environmental Health Engineering, Arizona State University, 1001 S McAlister Ave, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 20;718:137246. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137246. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
Animal fecal contamination in aquatic environments is a major source of zoonotic diseases in humans. While concerns are focused on livestock, companion animals such as dogs can also be a source of a wide range of zoonotic pathogens. Therefore, detection of dog or canine fecal contamination in aquatic environments is important for mitigating risks. In this study, host-sensitivity and specificity of four canine fecal-associated marker genes were evaluated by analyzing 30 canine and 240 non-canine fecal samples. The application of these markers was also tested in water from an urban river under dry weather conditions. The host sensitivity values of the Bacteroides BacCan-UCD, DogBact, DF113 and DF418 were 1.00, 0.90, 0.83, and 0.90, respectively. The host specificity value of the BacCan-UCD, DogBact, DF113 and DF418 were 0.87, 0.98, 0.83, and 0.41, respectively. The mean concentrations of DF418 were highest (7.82 ± 1.13 log gene copies (GC)/g of feces) followed by BacCan-UCD (7.61 ± 1.06 log GC/g) and DogBact (7.15 ± 0.92 log GC/g). The mean concentration of DF113 (5.80 ± 1.25 log GC/g) was 1.5 to 2.5 orders of magnitude lower than the other marker genes. The DogBact marker gene was not detected in any other animal feces other than a small number of untreated sewage samples. The BacCan-UCD marker gene cross-reacted with cat, chicken, and pig fecal samples, while the DF113 marker gene cross-reacted with cat, chicken, cattle fecal and untreated sewage samples. The DF418 marker gene was detected in all sewage and animal feces and deemed not suitable for canine fecal contamination tracking in sub-tropical Australia. Canine fecal contamination was infrequently detected in environmental water samples. Based on the results obtained in this study, we recommend that at least two canine feces-associated marker genes should be used in field studies.
水生环境中的动物粪便污染是人类中动物源性疾病的主要来源。尽管人们关注的是牲畜,但宠物狗等伴侣动物也可能是多种动物源性病原体的来源。因此,检测水生环境中狗或犬类粪便的污染对于降低风险非常重要。在这项研究中,通过分析 30 份犬粪和 240 份非犬粪样本,评估了四种犬粪相关标记基因的宿主敏感性和特异性。还在旱季城市河流的水中测试了这些标记物的应用。Bacteroides BacCan-UCD、DogBact、DF113 和 DF418 的宿主敏感性值分别为 1.00、0.90、0.83 和 0.90。BacCan-UCD、DogBact、DF113 和 DF418 的宿主特异性值分别为 0.87、0.98、0.83 和 0.41。DF418 的平均浓度最高(7.82±1.13 log 基因拷贝(GC)/g 粪便),其次是 BacCan-UCD(7.61±1.06 log GC/g)和 DogBact(7.15±0.92 log GC/g)。DF113 的平均浓度(5.80±1.25 log GC/g)比其他标记基因低 1.5 到 2.5 个数量级。除了少数未经处理的污水样本外,DogBact 标记基因未在任何其他动物粪便中检测到。BacCan-UCD 标记基因与猫、鸡和猪粪便样本发生交叉反应,而 DF113 标记基因与猫、鸡、牛粪便和未经处理的污水样本发生交叉反应。DF418 标记基因在所有污水和动物粪便中均有检测到,被认为不适合在澳大利亚亚热带地区追踪犬类粪便污染。在环境水样中很少检测到犬类粪便污染。基于本研究的结果,我们建议在野外研究中至少使用两种与犬类粪便相关的标记基因。