• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性价比:一种以利用为重点的方法,用于扩展经济评估的基础和贡献。

Value for money: A utilization-focused approach to extending the foundation and contribution of economic evaluation.

作者信息

Peterson Christina, Skolits Gary

机构信息

University of Tennessee, College of Education, Health & Human Sciences, United States.

University of Tennessee, College of Education, Health & Human Sciences, United States.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2020 Jun;80:101799. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101799. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101799
PMID:32106004
Abstract

Value for Money (VfM) is an evaluative question about the merit, worth, and significance of resource use in social programs. Although VfM is a critical component of evidence-based programming, it is often overlooked or avoided by evaluators and decision-makers. A framework for evaluating VfM across the dimensions of economy, effectiveness, efficiency, and equity has emerged in response to limitations of traditional economic evaluation. This framework for assessing VfM integrates methods for engaging stakeholders in evaluative thinking to increase acceptance and utilization of evaluations that address questions of resource use. In this review, we synthesize literature on the VfM framework and position it within a broader theory of Utilization-Focused Evaluation (UFE). We then examine mechanisms through which the VfM framework may contribute to increased evaluation use. Finally, we outline avenues for future research on VfM evaluation.

摘要

性价比(VfM)是一个关于社会项目中资源使用的价值、优点和意义的评估性问题。尽管性价比是循证项目规划的关键组成部分,但评估人员和决策者常常忽视或回避它。针对传统经济评估的局限性,一个从经济、有效性、效率和公平性维度评估性价比的框架应运而生。这个评估性价比的框架整合了让利益相关者参与评估性思考的方法,以提高对解决资源使用问题的评估的接受度和利用率。在本综述中,我们综合了关于性价比框架的文献,并将其置于更广泛的以利用为重点的评估(UFE)理论之中。然后,我们研究了性价比框架可能有助于增加评估使用的机制。最后,我们概述了性价比评估未来研究的方向。

相似文献

1
Value for money: A utilization-focused approach to extending the foundation and contribution of economic evaluation.性价比:一种以利用为重点的方法,用于扩展经济评估的基础和贡献。
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Jun;80:101799. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101799. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Digital interventions in mental health: evidence syntheses and economic modelling.数字干预在精神健康中的应用:证据综合和经济建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jan;26(1):1-182. doi: 10.3310/RCTI6942.
4
The health economics of insulin therapy: How do we address the rising demands, costs, inequalities and barriers to achieving optimal outcomes.胰岛素治疗的卫生经济学:我们如何应对不断增长的需求、成本、不平等现象以及实现最佳治疗效果的障碍。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jul;27 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):24-35. doi: 10.1111/dom.16488. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
5
Financial arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.低收入国家卫生系统的财务安排:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 11;9(9):CD011084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011084.pub2.
6
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.使用患者特异性截骨导向器的前路全踝关节置换术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
8
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
9
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping Evaluation Use: A Scoping Review of Extant Literature (2005-2022).映射评估用途:对现有文献(2005 - 2022年)的范围审查
Am J Eval. 2024 Sep;45(3):341-360. doi: 10.1177/10982140241234841. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) or the Highway? An Alternative Road to Investigating the Value for Money of International Development Research.成本效益分析(CBA)还是常规方法?探究国际发展研究资金价值的另一条途径。
Eur J Dev Res. 2023;35(2):260-280. doi: 10.1057/s41287-022-00565-7. Epub 2022 Oct 21.