• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于诊断结节性多动脉炎的临时性七项标准。

Provisional seven-item criteria for the diagnosis of polyarteritis nodosa.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, 7-33 Motomachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, 730-8518, Japan.

Department of Rheumatology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2020 Aug;40(8):1223-1227. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04535-2. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00296-020-04535-2
PMID:32107599
Abstract

Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a potentially life-threatening systemic vasculitis, which predominantly involves medium arteries. However, it may be difficult to diagnose PAN in its early stage. The aim of our study was to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) criteria for the diagnosis of PAN in a single-centre retrospective cohort in Japan and to develop simplified criteria with favourable diagnostic performance. All patients with "PAN" or "suspicion of PAN," as indicated on insurance forms, were included. The patient population was classified into PAN and non-PAN groups based on a retrospective chart review. The sensitivity and specificity of the ACR and MHLW criteria were calculated. Items that favourably discriminated the PAN group from the non-PAN group were determined and used as items for our provisional criteria. Thirteen cases of PAN and 24 cases without PAN were included in this study. The sensitivities of the ACR and MHLW criteria were 61.5% (8/13) and 30.8% (4/13), respectively, whereas the specificities were 79.2% (19/24) and 87.5% (21/24), respectively. We developed provisional criteria consisting of seven items, and found that a cut-off of ≥ 4 items had a sensitivity of 92.3% (12/13) and specificity of 91.7% (22/24) (p < 0.000001). The provisional seven-item criteria, developed in our real-world cohort of patients suspected of having PAN, had a high sensitivity and specificity and may be useful in the diagnosis of PAN, although it should be validated in additional patient populations.

摘要

结节性多动脉炎(PAN)是一种潜在危及生命的系统性血管炎,主要累及中等动脉。然而,在早期阶段诊断 PAN 可能具有挑战性。本研究旨在探讨日本单中心回顾性队列中美国风湿病学会(ACR)和日本厚生劳动省(MHLW)标准对 PAN 的诊断的敏感性和特异性,并制定具有良好诊断性能的简化标准。所有保险表上注明“PAN”或“疑似 PAN”的患者均被纳入研究。根据回顾性图表审查,将患者人群分为 PAN 组和非 PAN 组。计算 ACR 和 MHLW 标准的敏感性和特异性。确定有利于将 PAN 组与非 PAN 组区分的项目,并将其用作我们暂定标准的项目。本研究纳入了 13 例 PAN 患者和 24 例非 PAN 患者。ACR 和 MHLW 标准的敏感性分别为 61.5%(8/13)和 30.8%(4/13),特异性分别为 79.2%(19/24)和 87.5%(21/24)。我们制定了包含 7 项内容的暂定标准,发现≥4 项的截断值具有 92.3%(12/13)的敏感性和 91.7%(22/24)的特异性(p<0.000001)。在我们疑似患有 PAN 的真实世界患者队列中制定的暂定七项标准具有较高的敏感性和特异性,可能有助于 PAN 的诊断,尽管需要在其他患者人群中进行验证。

相似文献

1
Provisional seven-item criteria for the diagnosis of polyarteritis nodosa.用于诊断结节性多动脉炎的临时性七项标准。
Rheumatol Int. 2020 Aug;40(8):1223-1227. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04535-2. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
2
Validation of the provisional seven-item criteria for the diagnosis of polyarteritis nodosa.结节性多动脉炎诊断的临时七项标准的验证
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Sep;41(9):1651-1655. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-04867-7. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3
Are the 1990 American College of Rheumatology vasculitis classification criteria still valid?1990年美国风湿病学会血管炎分类标准仍然有效吗?
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Jul 1;56(7):1154-1161. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex075.
4
A paradigm of diagnostic criteria for polyarteritis nodosa: analysis of a series of 949 patients with vasculitides.结节性多动脉炎诊断标准范例:对949例血管炎患者的系列分析
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May;58(5):1528-38. doi: 10.1002/art.23470.
5
Clinical characteristics of patients with polyarteritis nodosa based on a nationwide database in Japan.基于日本全国数据库的结节性多动脉炎患者的临床特征。
Mod Rheumatol. 2022 Apr 18;32(3):598-605. doi: 10.1093/mr/roab019.
6
[Use of new diagnostic criteria for reclassification of polyarteritis nodosa].[使用新诊断标准对结节性多动脉炎进行重新分类]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 1;60(3):239-242. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20200619-00603.
7
Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa: revisiting its definition and diagnostic criteria.皮肤结节性多动脉炎:重新审视其定义和诊断标准。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2009 Jan;301(1):117-21. doi: 10.1007/s00403-008-0898-2. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
8
Diagnosis and classification of polyarteritis nodosa.结节性多动脉炎的诊断和分类。
J Autoimmun. 2014 Feb-Mar;48-49:84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.01.029. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
9
Comparison between classical polyarteritis nodosa and single organ vasculitis of medium-sized vessels: a retrospective study of 25 patients and review of the literature.结节性多动脉炎与中等大小血管单器官血管炎的比较:一项对25例患者的回顾性研究及文献复习
Acta Clin Belg. 2016 Feb;71(1):26-31. doi: 10.1179/2295333714Y.0000000114. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
Effect of classification on the incidence of polyarteritis nodosa and microscopic polyangiitis.分类对结节性多动脉炎和显微镜下多血管炎发病率的影响。
Arthritis Rheum. 1996 Jul;39(7):1208-12. doi: 10.1002/art.1780390720.

引用本文的文献

1
Polyarteritis nodosa in a patient with chronic hepatitis B following COVID-19 vaccination: a case report.1例新冠病毒疫苗接种后慢性乙型肝炎患者并发结节性多动脉炎:病例报告
Oxf Med Case Reports. 2023 Sep 25;2023(9):omad092. doi: 10.1093/omcr/omad092. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Validation of the provisional seven-item criteria for the diagnosis of polyarteritis nodosa.结节性多动脉炎诊断的临时七项标准的验证
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Sep;41(9):1651-1655. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-04867-7. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3
Clinical Approach to Diagnosis and Therapy of Polyarteritis Nodosa.
巨细胞动脉炎的临床诊断与治疗方法。
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2021 Feb 10;23(3):14. doi: 10.1007/s11926-021-00983-2.