Suppr超能文献

采用预装注射器和自动注射器的生物-器械组合产品的设备参数和研究桥接的系统评价

Systematic Review of Device Parameters and Design of Studies Bridging Biologic-Device Combination Products Using Prefilled Syringes and Autoinjectors.

机构信息

Oak Ridge of Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.

Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (OCP/CDER/FDA), 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, USA.

出版信息

AAPS J. 2020 Feb 27;22(2):52. doi: 10.1208/s12248-020-0433-8.

Abstract

Biologic-device combination products using prefilled syringes (PFSs) and autoinjectors (AIs) are popular for biological products administered subcutaneously. Pharmacokinetic (PK) comparability studies commonly provide the scientific data to support introduction of AI presentations via bridging with PFS. A survey of biological products approved by FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research identified 17 biologics license applications (BLAs) with both PFS and AI presentations for subcutaneous (SC) administration, including 16 approved on February 1, 2018, and one with AI presentation under review. A systematic review on the device parameters and the PK comparability studies bridging the two presentations was conducted. Subsequently, whether device parameters or the PK study design may have influenced the PK comparability study results was evaluated. The reported device parameters for AI and PFS are generally consistent across BLAs, whereas the approach to assess PK comparability varied, including the study design. Most PK comparability studies met bioequivalence (BE) criteria. Upon inspection of the studies that did not meet BE criteria, injection depth of AI and the injection site for either AI or PFS were identified as potential influencing factors to the outcome of PK comparability study. This study represents an initial attempt to identify the potential influencing factors on device bridging, including the characteristics of the device and the clinical pharmacology study. These findings may inform the combination product development strategy, specifically design considerations for device and PK comparability studies.

摘要

使用预充式注射器 (PFS) 和自动注射器 (AI) 的生物器械组合产品,因其可用于皮下给药而广受欢迎。药代动力学 (PK) 可比性研究通常提供支持通过与 PFS 桥接引入 AI 制剂的科学数据。对 FDA 药物评价与研究中心批准的生物制品进行的调查确定了 17 种具有 PFS 和 AI 制剂用于皮下 (SC) 给药的生物制品许可申请 (BLA),其中包括 16 种于 2018 年 2 月 1 日批准,一种具有 AI 制剂正在审查中。对两种制剂的设备参数和桥接 PK 可比性研究进行了系统评价。随后,评估了设备参数或 PK 研究设计是否可能影响 PK 可比性研究结果。AI 和 PFS 的报告设备参数在 BLA 中通常是一致的,而评估 PK 可比性的方法有所不同,包括研究设计。大多数 PK 可比性研究均符合生物等效性 (BE) 标准。在检查不符合 BE 标准的研究时,确定 AI 的注射深度以及 AI 或 PFS 的注射部位是影响 PK 可比性研究结果的潜在因素。本研究首次尝试确定影响设备桥接的潜在因素,包括设备的特点和临床药理学研究。这些发现可能为组合产品开发策略提供信息,特别是设备和 PK 可比性研究的设计考虑因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验