• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of a single-item visual analog scale measuring goals of care in patients with advanced cancer.一种用于测量晚期癌症患者的照护目标的单项目视觉模拟量表的心理测量学特性。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jul;29(7):1999-2005. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02458-w. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
2
Measurement of quality of life in patients with lung cancer in multicenter trials of new therapies. Psychometric assessment of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale.新疗法多中心试验中肺癌患者生活质量的测量。肺癌症状量表的心理测量评估。
Cancer. 1994 Apr 15;73(8):2087-98. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940415)73:8<2087::aid-cncr2820730813>3.0.co;2-x.
3
Reliability, validity and sensitivity of a computerized visual analog scale measuring state anxiety.一种测量状态焦虑的计算机化视觉模拟量表的信度、效度和敏感性。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;45(4):447-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
4
Measurement of Quality of Life in Patients with Mycosis Fungoides/Sézary Syndrome Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: Development of an Electronic Instrument.蕈样肉芽肿/赛塞里综合征皮肤T细胞淋巴瘤患者生活质量的测量:一种电子仪器的开发
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 7;21(1):e11302. doi: 10.2196/11302.
5
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Quality of Life Index for patients with cancer.癌症患者生活质量指数日本版的信度和效度。
Res Nurs Health. 2020 Apr;43(2):176-185. doi: 10.1002/nur.22011. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
6
The Hausa 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12): Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation in mixed urban and rural Nigerian populations with chronic low back pain.《豪萨 12 项简短健康调查(SF-12)》:在患有慢性下腰痛的混合城乡尼日利亚人群中进行翻译、跨文化调适和验证。
PLoS One. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232223. eCollection 2020.
7
Assessment of craving in opioid use disorder: Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of the opioid craving VAS.阿片类物质使用障碍渴求评估:阿片类物质渴求 VAS 的心理测量学评估和预测效度。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Dec 1;229(Pt B):109057. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109057. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
Psychometric properties of the Czech Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale: reliability and content validity analysis.捷克综合姑息治疗结局量表的心理测量学特性:信度和内容效度分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Mar 25;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00552-x.
9
Assessment of the test-retest reliability and construct validity of a modified Lequesne index in knee osteoarthritis.改良Lequesne指数在膝骨关节炎中的重测信度和结构效度评估。
Joint Bone Spine. 2003 Dec;70(6):521-5. doi: 10.1016/s1297-319x(03)00070-8.
10
Measuring quality of life in patients with pleural mesothelioma using a modified version of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS): psychometric properties of the LCSS-Meso.使用肺癌症状量表(LCSS)的修订版测量胸膜间皮瘤患者的生活质量:LCSS-Meso的心理测量特性。
Support Care Cancer. 2006 Jan;14(1):11-21. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0837-0. Epub 2005 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Music Therapy in Reducing Anxiety Among Postsurgical Cancer Patients: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.音乐疗法对降低癌症术后患者焦虑情绪的疗效:一项开放标签随机对照试验。
Cureus. 2025 May 3;17(5):e83392. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83392. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation therapy versus manual therapy in patients with neck pain: a randomised controlled trial.本体感觉神经肌肉促进疗法与手法治疗颈痛患者的随机对照试验。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Sep 5;56:jrm40002. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.40002.
3
Pain and Coping Strategies as Determinants of Malnutrition Risk in Lung Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.疼痛和应对策略是肺癌患者营养不良风险的决定因素:一项横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Jul 10;16(14):2193. doi: 10.3390/nu16142193.
4
Understanding Factors That Predict Advance Directive Completion.了解预测预先指示完成情况的因素。
Palliat Med Rep. 2022 Sep 27;3(1):220-224. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2021.0073. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Advanced cancer patients' understanding of prognostic information: Applying insights from psychological research.晚期癌症患者对预后信息的理解:运用心理研究的见解。
Cancer Med. 2019 Aug;8(9):4081-4088. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2331. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
2
Test-retest reliability, agreement, and minimal detectable change in the 6-minute walk test in patients with intermittent claudication.间歇性跛行患者 6 分钟步行试验的重测信度、一致性和最小可检测变化。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;71(1):197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.056. Epub 2019 May 27.
3
Patient-reported outcomes of symptom burden in patients receiving surgical or nonsurgical treatment for low-intermediate risk oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A comparative analysis of a prospective registry.接受手术或非手术治疗低中危口咽鳞状细胞癌患者的症状负担的患者报告结局:前瞻性登记的对比分析。
Oral Oncol. 2019 Apr;91:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
4
Analyzing Goals of Care in Advanced Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers: Evidence-based Research.分析晚期癌症患者及其家庭照顾者的照护目标:循证研究
POJ Nurs Pract Res. 2018;2(1). doi: 10.32648/2577-9516/2/1/003. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
5
Intraclass correlation: Improved modeling approaches and applications for neuroimaging.组内相关系数:神经影像学的改进建模方法和应用。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Mar;39(3):1187-1206. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23909. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
6
Care Planning for Inpatients Referred for Palliative Care Consultation.患者转入姑息治疗咨询后的护理计划。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):48-54. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6313.
7
Achieving Goal-Concordant Care: A Conceptual Model and Approach to Measuring Serious Illness Communication and Its Impact.实现目标一致的医疗照护:一个严重疾病沟通及其影响的概念模型和测量方法。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(S2):S17-S27. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0459. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
8
How to analyze the Visual Analogue Scale: Myths, truths and clinical relevance.如何分析视觉模拟量表:误区、真相及临床相关性。
Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
9
What Enables Oncologists to Discuss Goals of Care With Their Patients? Practical Ways Toward a Culture of Kindness, Transparency, and Responsibility.是什么让肿瘤学家能够与患者讨论治疗目标?通往友善、透明和负责文化的实用方法。
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Sep;13(9):591-593. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.026492. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
10
Visual analogue scale (VAS) as a monitoring tool for daily changes in asthma symptoms in adolescents: a prospective study.视觉模拟量表(VAS)作为青少年哮喘症状每日变化的监测工具:一项前瞻性研究。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2017 Apr 28;13:24. doi: 10.1186/s13223-017-0196-7. eCollection 2017.

一种用于测量晚期癌症患者的照护目标的单项目视觉模拟量表的心理测量学特性。

Psychometric properties of a single-item visual analog scale measuring goals of care in patients with advanced cancer.

机构信息

Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, School of Nursing, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44104, USA.

Case Western Reserve University, School of Nursing, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44104, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2020 Jul;29(7):1999-2005. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02458-w. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-020-02458-w
PMID:32108302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7875008/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of a single-item visual analog scale (VAS) to measure goals of care in patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS

Data were obtained from 378 patients with diagnoses of advanced lung, gastrointestinal, or pancreatic cancer. Goal of care was measured at baseline and every 3 months until patient death or completion of the 15-month study period. A single-item VAS ranging from 0 (quality of life is all that matters) to 100 (length of life is all that matters) was used to measure patients' goals of care for all study subjects; a subsample of subjects also completed the Quality of Life-Length of Life scale which asked patients to select categories of preferences. Test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation) and construct validity (known-groups, convergent, divergent) were evaluated.

RESULTS

At 9 and 12 months, the test-retest reliability for patients with stable symptoms (n = 107) was established with the ICC = 0.81, p < .001. Known-groups (r = 0.99, p < .001), convergent (r = 0.78, p < .001), and divergent (r = .06, p = 0.24) validity all demonstrated evidence of good construct validity.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary psychometric testing for a single-item VAS that measures goals of care in a sample of patients with advanced cancer met standard requirements for reliability and validity. While further testing with a larger sample size is recommended, the tool's use in the clinical area to assess cancer patients' goals of care is appropriate. Such a tool could facilitate goals of care discussions in the clinical area.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验一种用于测量晚期癌症患者治疗目标的单项目视觉模拟量表(VAS)的心理测量学特性。

方法

数据来自 378 名诊断为晚期肺癌、胃肠道或胰腺癌的患者。在基线时以及在患者死亡或完成 15 个月的研究期之前的每 3 个月测量一次治疗目标。使用一个从 0(生活质量最重要)到 100(寿命最重要)的单项目 VAS 来测量所有研究对象的治疗目标;研究对象的一个子样本还完成了生活质量-寿命量表,该量表要求患者选择偏好类别。评估了测试-重测信度(组内相关系数)和结构效度(已知组、收敛、发散)。

结果

在 9 个月和 12 个月时,对于症状稳定的患者(n=107),测试-重测信度 ICC=0.81,p<0.001。具有良好的结构效度的证据,包括已知组(r=0.99,p<0.001)、收敛(r=0.78,p<0.001)和发散(r=0.06,p=0.24)。

结论

在晚期癌症患者样本中测量治疗目标的单项目 VAS 的初步心理测量测试符合可靠性和有效性的标准要求。虽然建议进一步用更大的样本量进行测试,但该工具在临床领域用于评估癌症患者的治疗目标是合适的。这样的工具可以促进临床领域的治疗目标讨论。