Avicena LLC, Pasadena, CA, United States of America.
Physiol Meas. 2020 Jun 3;41(5):055008. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab7b3f.
Here we introduce Vivio, a wireless optical tonometer, and compare its pulse waveform measurement capabilities to the AtCor SphygmoCor.
Pulse waveform data from both devices was captured on a heterogeneous cohort of 29 participants (15 males, 14 females), including 16 healthy individuals free from cardiovascular diseases and 13 patients with one or more cardiovascular diseases. These participants were a subgroup of the Huntington Medical Research Institutes (HMRI) iPhone Heart Study. Main r esults: Carotid pulse waveforms captured by Vivio were comparable to those captured using the AtCor SphygmoCor tonometer. The point-by-point root-mean-square error between averaged waveforms captured by either device on the same participant was 6.3% with a standard deviation of 2%. The harmonic content of the pulse waveforms captured by either device was also similar. Data collected by Vivio displayed good to excellent agreement across a wide range of pulse waveform features such as left ventricular ejection time, reflected wave arrival time, the ratio of systolic to diastolic time intervals, and heart rate. A comparison between augmentation index (AI) measured by Vivio and tonometry showed a correlation of 0.82 (p < 0.01). Bland-Altman analysis of this data yielded a bias of -2.5% and limits of agreement spanning -15.1%-10.1%.
The Vivio has the potential to enhance the availability of noninvasive pulse waveform data, thereby expanding the tools available for the diagnosis and monitoring of cardiovascular disease. When used in combination with advanced waveform analysis methods, Vivio can impact mobile healthcare resulting in improved patient health, quality of life and the overall reduction of healthcare costs.
我们在这里介绍 Vivio,一种无线光学眼压计,并将其与 AtCor SphygmoCor 的脉搏波测量能力进行比较。
来自两种设备的脉搏波数据是在一个由 29 名参与者(15 名男性,14 名女性)组成的异质队列中采集的,包括 16 名无心血管疾病的健康个体和 13 名患有一种或多种心血管疾病的患者。这些参与者是亨廷顿医学研究所(HMRI)iPhone 心脏研究的一个亚组。主要结果:Vivio 捕获的颈动脉脉搏波与使用 AtCor SphygmoCor 眼压计捕获的脉搏波相似。在同一参与者中,两种设备捕获的平均脉搏波之间的逐点均方根误差为 6.3%,标准偏差为 2%。两种设备捕获的脉搏波的谐波含量也相似。Vivio 采集的数据在广泛的脉搏波特征范围内显示出良好到极好的一致性,如左心室射血时间、反射波到达时间、收缩期与舒张期时间比和心率。Vivio 测量的增强指数(AI)与眼压计的比较显示相关性为 0.82(p<0.01)。对该数据的 Bland-Altman 分析得出的偏差为-2.5%,一致性界限为-15.1%至-10.1%。
Vivio 有可能增强无创脉搏波数据的可用性,从而扩展用于诊断和监测心血管疾病的工具。当与先进的波形分析方法结合使用时,Vivio 可以影响移动医疗保健,从而改善患者的健康、生活质量,并整体降低医疗保健成本。