Miller E R, Wood J L, Andolsek L, Ogrinc-Oven M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1978;16(2):144-9. doi: 10.1002/j.1879-3479.1978.tb00415.x.
This study compares the performances of four physicians using two types of plastic cannulae (flexible and rigid) for 1100 vacuum aspiration procedures. The criteria for assessing physician performance by cannula type were: (a) frequency of cannula obstructions, (b) amount of retained tissue obtained by sharp curettage after vacuum aspiration, (c) estimated blood loss during the procedure and (d) time required to perform the procedure. Data for each physician were compared and yielded significantly different results. The length of time required to use the cannula differed significantly among physicians; two of them had significantly shorter cannula times with the flexible instrument. The others had the lowest distributions of blood loss and the most difference between cannula usage. Consistent grouping over several variables suggests that differences in these criteria are more likely to be attributable to subtle distinctions in operator technique than to variations in equipment.
本研究比较了四位医生使用两种类型的塑料套管(柔性和刚性)进行1100例真空抽吸手术的表现。按套管类型评估医生表现的标准为:(a)套管堵塞频率,(b)真空抽吸后锐性刮宫获得的残留组织量,(c)手术过程中的估计失血量,以及(d)完成手术所需时间。对每位医生的数据进行了比较,结果有显著差异。医生使用套管所需的时间长度有显著差异;其中两位医生使用柔性器械时套管使用时间明显更短。其他医生的失血量分布最低,套管使用之间的差异最大。在多个变量上的一致分组表明,这些标准的差异更可能归因于手术操作技术的细微差别,而非设备的差异。