Qvigstad Christian, Tait R Campbell, de Moerloose Philippe, Holme Pål Andre
Department of Haematology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jan 16;4(2):309-317. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12298. eCollection 2020 Feb.
Macroscopic hematuria is considered a significant risk factor for urologic disease, and it is highly prevalent in people with hemophilia.
To determine whether prophylactic factor replacement therapy is associated with reduced occurrence of macroscopic hematuria in people with hemophilia in a post hoc analysis using data from a cross-sectional study conducted by the Age-Related Developments and Comobordities in Hemophilia (ADVANCE) Working Group that included males with hemophilia ≥40 years of age.
Data from 16 contributing centers, in 13 European countries and Israel, were analyzed using logistic regression. Of 532 recruited individuals, this analysis included 370 patients with moderate or severe hemophilia who received on-demand or prophylactic therapy.
For patients with a history of macroscopic hematuria, we analyzed the association between prophylaxis and reoccurrence of macroscopic hematuria within the past 5 years (n = 235 patients). Frequent (≥3 times/wk) prophylaxis was negatively associated with a recent episode of macroscopic hematuria (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.76). We also analyzed whether prophylaxis corresponded to a lower lifetime number of macroscopic hematuria episodes (n = 285 patients). Frequent prophylaxis for >15 years was associated with a lower number of episodes compared to on-demand treatment (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16-0.54), whereas nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and severe hemophilia were associated with a higher number. There was no association of prophylaxis <3 times/wk with hematuria.
Frequent prophylaxis was negatively associated with the number of episodes of macroscopic hematuria in people with hemophilia. Prevalence of macroscopic hematuria was higher among individuals with severe hemophilia and those regularly using NSAIDs.
肉眼血尿被认为是泌尿系统疾病的一个重要危险因素,在血友病患者中非常普遍。
在一项事后分析中,利用血友病年龄相关发展与合并症(ADVANCE)工作组开展的一项横断面研究的数据,确定预防性因子替代疗法是否与血友病患者肉眼血尿发生率降低相关,该研究纳入了年龄≥40岁的男性血友病患者。
使用逻辑回归分析来自13个欧洲国家和以色列的16个参与中心的数据。在532名招募的个体中,该分析纳入了370名接受按需或预防性治疗的中度或重度血友病患者。
对于有肉眼血尿病史的患者,我们分析了预防性治疗与过去5年内肉眼血尿复发之间的关联(n = 235例患者)。频繁(≥3次/周)预防性治疗与近期肉眼血尿发作呈负相关(比值比[OR],0.38;95%置信区间[CI],0.18 - 0.76)。我们还分析了预防性治疗是否与较低的终身肉眼血尿发作次数相关(n = 285例患者)。与按需治疗相比,超过15年的频繁预防性治疗与发作次数较少相关(OR,0.29;95% CI,0.16 - 0.54),而非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和重度血友病与发作次数较多相关。每周<3次的预防性治疗与血尿无关联。
频繁预防性治疗与血友病患者肉眼血尿发作次数呈负相关。重度血友病患者和经常使用NSAIDs的患者中肉眼血尿的患病率较高。