Callary Stuart A, Jones Claire F, Kantar Karim, Du Toit Heleen, Baker Markus P, Thewlis Dominic, Atkins Gerald J, Solomon Lucian B
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Centre for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 26;9(3):626. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030626.
Tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) are challenging, requiring complex open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and are often associated with complications including surgical site infections (SSIs). In 2007, we introduced a novel management protocol to treat TPFs which consisted of an angiosome- or perforator-sparing (APS) anterolateral approach followed by unrestricted weight bearing and range of motion. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to investigate complication rates and patient outcomes associated with our new management protocol. In total, 79 TPFs treated between 2004 and 2007 through a classic anterolateral surgical approach formed the "Classic Group"; while 66 TPFS treated between 2007 and 2013 formed the "APS Group". Fracture reduction, maintenance of reduction and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. There was a clinically important improvement in the infection incidence with the APS (1.5%) versus the Classic technique (7.6%) (1/66 versus 2/79 for superficial infections; 0/66 versus 4/79 for deep infections). Despite a more aggressive rehabilitation, there was no difference in the fracture reduction over time or the functional outcomes between both groups ( > 0.05). The APS anterolateral approach improved the rate of SSIs after TPFs without compromising fracture reduction and stabilisation. We continue to use this new management approach and early unrestricted weight bearing when treating amenable TPFs.
胫骨平台骨折(TPF)治疗颇具挑战性,需要复杂的切开复位内固定术(ORIF),且常伴有包括手术部位感染(SSI)在内的并发症。2007年,我们引入了一种新型治疗方案来治疗TPF,该方案包括保留血管体或穿支(APS)的前外侧入路,随后进行无限制负重和关节活动度训练。这项回顾性研究的主要目的是调查与我们新治疗方案相关的并发症发生率和患者预后。2004年至2007年期间通过经典前外侧手术入路治疗的79例TPF构成了“经典组”;而2007年至2013年期间治疗的66例TPF构成了“APS组”。评估了骨折复位情况、复位维持情况以及患者报告的预后。与经典技术(7.6%)相比,APS技术的感染发生率有了具有临床意义的改善(浅表感染:1/66比2/79;深部感染:0/66比4/79)。尽管康复训练更为积极,但两组在骨折复位随时间的变化情况或功能预后方面并无差异(P>0.05)。APS前外侧入路提高了TPF术后的SSI发生率,同时不影响骨折复位和固定。在治疗适合的TPF时,我们继续使用这种新的治疗方法和早期无限制负重。