Suppr超能文献

系统文献回顾和光谱 CT 与闪烁扫描术诊断急性和慢性肺栓塞的荟萃分析。

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of spectral CT compared to scintigraphy in the diagnosis of acute and chronic pulmonary embolisms.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Southwest Jutland, Esbjerg, Denmark.

Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul;30(7):3624-3633. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06735-7. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the diagnostic accuracy of spectral CT pulmonary angiography (S-CTPA) using ventilation-perfusions lung scintigraphy (V/Q-scan) as a reference standard in the diagnosis of acute or chronic pulmonary embolism (APE/CPE) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for the period from 1 Jan 2006 to 7 Feb 2019; eligible studies had > 10 patients over 18 years old, a diagnostic outcome of PE or CTEPH, and used V/Q scan as a reference standard. Bias and applicability were assessed using QUADAS-2 tools. Sensitivities, specificities, and predictive values were noted or calculated from available information. Meta-analysis employed a fixed-effects model of Mantel and Haenszel. Heterogeneity was assessed with I-squared statistics.

RESULTS

Four hundred ninety-three unique records were identified. Following screening by title, 53 studies were included in the abstract and full-text assessment. A total of six articles were included; four were suitable for a meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity was 94.2% (95% CI, 88.3-100%), pooled specificity was 88.5% (95% CI, 81.3-95.6%), and positive and negative predictive values were 87.8% (95% CI, 80.3-95.4%) and 94.5% (95% CI, 89.3-99.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Data on S-CTPA for PE/CTEPH remains promising, but limited; only small studies with methodological issues are available. Evidence is best for CPE/CTEPH whereas no firm conclusions are possible for APE. There is a need for larger, prospective studies with a robust composite reference standard including state-of-the-art CTPA and V/Q-scans.

KEY POINTS

• S-CTPA has high sensitivity and specificity for perfusion defects in patients with PE or CPETH. • Methodological issues and diversity of reference standards were found in the small number of included studies. • There is a need for larger prospective studies with more robust composite reference standards.

摘要

目的

使用通气灌注肺闪烁扫描(V/Q 扫描)作为参考标准,研究光谱 CT 肺动脉造影(S-CTPA)在诊断急性或慢性肺栓塞(APE/CPE)和慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)中的诊断准确性。

方法

在 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 2 月 7 日期间,在 PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上检索文献;纳入的研究对象为年龄超过 18 岁的患者,其诊断结果为 PE 或 CTEPH,并使用 V/Q 扫描作为参考标准。使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估偏倚和适用性。根据可用信息记录或计算灵敏度、特异性和预测值。采用 Mantel-Haenszel 的固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。用 I 平方统计量评估异质性。

结果

共检索到 493 条记录,通过标题筛选后,有 53 项研究进入摘要和全文评估,共纳入 6 项研究,其中 4 项适合荟萃分析。汇总敏感性为 94.2%(95%CI,88.3-100%),汇总特异性为 88.5%(95%CI,81.3-95.6%),阳性和阴性预测值分别为 87.8%(95%CI,80.3-95.4%)和 94.5%(95%CI,89.3-99.7%)。

结论

关于 S-CTPA 在 PE/CTEPH 中的应用,数据仍然很有前景,但有限;仅有一些存在方法学问题的小研究可用。该证据最适用于 CPE/CTEPH,而对于 APE 则无法得出明确结论。需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,使用包括最先进的 CTPA 和 V/Q 扫描在内的综合参考标准。

关键点

  • S-CTPA 对 PE 或 CTEPH 患者的灌注缺陷具有高灵敏度和特异性。

  • 在少数纳入的研究中,发现了方法学问题和参考标准的多样性。

  • 需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,采用更稳健的综合参考标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验