Mathis Christopher, Romans Ryan, Divekar Abhay
Pediatric Cardiology, Ward Family Heart Center, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kanas City, Missouri, USA.
Rocky Mountain Pediatric Cardiology, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep 1;96(3):620-625. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28825. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
To compare the outer diameter (OD) of conventional and radial sheaths from different manufacturers for sizes typically used in infant catheterization.
The smallest sheath size is recommended to minimize risk of arterial injury in infants. However, sheath size refers to its internal diameter (ID), but it is the larger OD that determines risk. The OD varies between manufacturers and is frequently not known to the end user.
Three authors measured the OD of 3, 3.3, 4, 5, and 6 French (Fr) sheaths from different manufacturers using a Mitutoyo digital micrometer. Continuous variables are reported as mean ± SD. The midshaft and proximal-shaft sheath measurements were compared using an independent samples t test. Agreement between author measurements was tested using intra- and inter-rater reliability analysis. Manufacturer sheath OD measurements were obtained. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.
There was no difference in the measured sheath diameters at the midpoint and proximally (p < .05). The intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were excellent (Intraclass correlation coefficient 1.0). Among conventional sheaths the OD varied between manufacturers, Terumo sheaths had the smallest and Galt sheaths had the largest OD. Radial sheaths had the smallest OD (1 Fr smaller) when compared to similar sized conventional sheaths. For instance, the OD of 4 Fr radial sheath (1.610 ± 0.006 mm) is essentially the same as the OD of the conventional 3 Fr (1.644 ± 0.016 mm) and 3.3 Fr (1.635 ± 0.005 mm) sheaths.
Our study shows variation in the OD of sheaths used in infant catheterization. The radial sheaths offer the smallest OD across sizes.
比较不同制造商生产的常规鞘管和桡动脉鞘管的外径(OD),这些鞘管尺寸常用于婴儿导管插入术。
建议使用最小尺寸的鞘管以将婴儿动脉损伤风险降至最低。然而,鞘管尺寸指的是其内径(ID),但决定风险的是较大的外径。不同制造商生产的鞘管外径各不相同,终端用户通常并不知晓。
三位作者使用三丰数字千分尺测量了不同制造商生产的3、3.3、4、5和6法国(Fr)鞘管的外径。连续变量以均值±标准差的形式报告。使用独立样本t检验比较鞘管中轴和近端的测量值。通过评分者内和评分者间可靠性分析来检验作者测量结果之间的一致性。获取了制造商鞘管外径的测量值。设定统计学显著性水平为p < 0.05。
在中点和近端测量的鞘管直径没有差异(p < 0.05)。评分者内和评分者间的可靠性极佳(组内相关系数为1.0)。在常规鞘管中,不同制造商生产的鞘管外径有所不同,泰尔茂鞘管的外径最小,高尔特鞘管的外径最大。与相同尺寸的常规鞘管相比,桡动脉鞘管的外径最小(小1 Fr)。例如,4 Fr桡动脉鞘管的外径(1.610 ± 0.006 mm)与常规3 Fr(1.644 ± 0.016 mm)和3.3 Fr(1.635 ± 0.005 mm)鞘管的外径基本相同。
我们的研究表明婴儿导管插入术中使用的鞘管外径存在差异。桡动脉鞘管在各个尺寸中提供最小的外径。