Küçükkurt Sercan, Değerliyurt K
Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;78(6):1019.e1-1019.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.01.030. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
The present study compared the postoperative pain, edema, patient satisfaction, and operating time with the use of piezosurgery, a reciprocal microsaw, and conventional burrs in the surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) technique for the correction of transversal maxillary deficiency. The results of the present study may help clinicians minimize the postoperative complaints of patients after SARPE.
The present randomized single-blind study included patients who had undergone SARPE with piezosurgery, a reciprocating microsaw, or conventional burrs. To determine the facial norms and postoperative facial edema, 4 anatomic distances were measured on the patients' face using the modified flexible ruler method. The mean facial edema score was determined to evaluate and compare the overall edema among the groups. Two separate visual analog scales were used to assess patients' postoperative pain and intraoperative satisfaction. The duration of the osteotomies was recorded. Intragroup data were statistically analyzed via a t test, and intergroup data were analyzed via a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Spearman's correlation was used to evaluate the relationships among the variables.
For the 80 patients, edema (second day: piezosurgery, 0.53 ± 0.34; microsaw, 0.61 ± 0.30; burrs, 0.94 ± 0.33; P < .001) and pain (piezosurgery, 2.3 ± 0.3; microsaw, 3.6 ± 0.4; burrs, 3.9 ± 0.6; P < .001) were greater for conventional burrs and microsaws, with statistically significant differences. Patient satisfaction (piezosurgery, 8.3 ± 0.3; microsaw, 5.5 ± 0.5; burrs, 5.1 ± 0.9; P < .001) was greater with piezosurgery. However, in the piezosurgery group, the duration of osteotomies was 50% greater (piezosurgery, 16.10 ± 3.30; microsaw, 11.05 ± 2.09; burrs, 11.2 ± 2.14; P < .001).
The results from the present study have shown that piezosurgery is an effective method for minimizing facial edema and patient morbidity and increasing patient satisfaction during SARPE. Moreover, the use of conventional burrs and microsaws prolonged the duration of facial edema.
本研究比较了在外科辅助快速上颌扩弓(SARPE)技术中使用压电手术、往复式微型锯和传统牙钻来矫正横向上颌骨发育不全时的术后疼痛、水肿、患者满意度和手术时间。本研究结果可能有助于临床医生将SARPE术后患者的主诉降至最低。
本随机单盲研究纳入了接受过压电手术、往复式微型锯或传统牙钻进行SARPE的患者。为确定面部标准和术后面部水肿情况,使用改良软尺法在患者面部测量4个解剖学距离。确定平均面部水肿评分以评估和比较各组间的总体水肿情况。使用两个独立的视觉模拟量表来评估患者的术后疼痛和术中满意度。记录截骨持续时间。组内数据通过t检验进行统计学分析,组间数据通过非参数Kruskal-Wallis检验进行分析。使用Spearman相关性分析来评估变量之间的关系。
对于80例患者,传统牙钻和微型锯组的水肿(第二天:压电手术组,0.53±0.34;微型锯组,0.61±0.30;牙钻组,0.94±0.33;P<.001)和疼痛(压电手术组,2.3±0.3;微型锯组,3.6±0.4;牙钻组,3.9±0.6;P<.001)更严重,差异具有统计学意义。压电手术组的患者满意度更高(压电手术组,8.3±0.3;微型锯组,5.5±0.5;牙钻组,5.1±0.9;P<.001)。然而,在压电手术组中,截骨持续时间长50%(压电手术组,16.10±3.30;微型锯组,11.05±2.09;牙钻组,11.2±2.14;P<.001)。
本研究结果表明,压电手术是一种在SARPE期间将面部水肿和患者发病率降至最低并提高患者满意度的有效方法。此外,使用传统牙钻和微型锯会延长面部水肿的持续时间。