Suppr超能文献

体外膜肺氧合在新生儿呼吸支持中的应用。

Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Neonatal Respiratory Support.

机构信息

East Midlands Congenital Heart Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK; Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

East Midlands Congenital Heart Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;32(3):553-559. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.02.021. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

Abstract

To review our experience with Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) for respiratory support in neonates. From 1989 to 2018 2114 patients underwent respiratory ECMO support, with 764 (36%) neonates. Veno-Venous (V-V) cannulation was used in 428 (56%) neonates and Veno-Arterial (V-A) in 336 (44%). Historically V-V ECMO was our preferred modality, but due to lack of suitable cannula in the last 7 years V-A was used in 209/228 (92%) neonates. Mean and inter-quartile range of ECMO duration was 117 hours (inter-quartile range 90 to 164 hours). Overall 724 (95%) neonates survived to ECMO decannulation, with 640 (84%) hospital discharge. Survival varied with underlying diagnosis: meconium aspiration 98% (354/362), persistent pulmonary hypertension 80% (120/151), congenital diaphragmatic hernia 66% (82/124), sepsis 59% (35/59), pneumonia 86% (6/7), other 71% (43/61). Survival was 86% with V-V and 80% with V-A cannulation, better than ELSO Registry with 77% V-V and 63% V-A. Major complications: cerebral infarction/hemorrhage in 4.7% (31.1% survival to discharge), renal replacement therapy in 17.6% (58.1% survival to discharge), new infection in 2.9%, with negative impact on survival (30%). Following a circuit design modification and subsequent reduction in heparin requirement, intracerebral hemorrhage decreased to 9/299 (3.0%) radiologically proven cerebral infarction/hemorrhage. We concluded (1) outcomes from neonatal ECMO in our large case series were excellent, with better survival and lower complication rate than reported in ELSO registry. (2) These results highlight the benefits of ECMO service in high volume units. (3) The similar survival rate seen in neonates with V-A and V-V cannulation differs from the ELSO register; this may reflect the change in cannulation enforced by lack of suitable V-V cannula and all neonates undergoing V-A cannulation.

摘要

回顾我们在新生儿呼吸支持中使用体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)的经验。1989 年至 2018 年,共有 2114 例患者接受了呼吸 ECMO 支持,其中 764 例(36%)为新生儿。428 例(56%)新生儿采用静脉-静脉(V-V)插管,336 例(44%)采用静脉-动脉(V-A)插管。从历史上看,V-V ECMO 是我们首选的方式,但由于在过去 7 年中缺乏合适的插管,209/228 例(92%)新生儿采用了 V-A。ECMO 持续时间的平均值和四分位间距为 117 小时(四分位间距 90-164 小时)。总体而言,724 例(95%)新生儿成功脱机,640 例(84%)出院。存活率随基础诊断而变化:胎粪吸入 98%(354/362),持续性肺动脉高压 80%(120/151),先天性膈疝 66%(82/124),败血症 59%(35/59),肺炎 86%(6/7),其他 71%(43/61)。V-V 组的存活率为 86%,V-A 组为 80%,优于 ELSO 登记处的 77%V-V 和 63%V-A。主要并发症:脑梗死/出血 4.7%(31.1%存活至出院),肾脏替代治疗 17.6%(58.1%存活至出院),新发感染 2.9%,对存活率有负面影响(30%)。在对回路设计进行修改并随后减少肝素需求后,经放射学证实的脑梗死/出血从 299 例中的 9 例(3.0%)减少。我们得出结论:(1)我们的大型病例系列中新生儿 ECMO 的结果非常出色,存活率更高,并发症发生率低于 ELSO 登记处报告的结果。(2)这些结果强调了大容量单位 ECMO 服务的优势。(3)在 V-A 和 V-V 插管的新生儿中看到的相似存活率与 ELSO 登记处不同;这可能反映了由于缺乏合适的 V-V 插管而强制进行的插管变化,以及所有接受 V-A 插管的新生儿。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验