Lawler K A, Schmied L A
Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996.
Percept Mot Skills. 1988 Aug;67(1):103-13. doi: 10.2466/pms.1988.67.1.103.
Recent studies have suggested that persons exhibiting the Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern allocate their attention to the environment differently than those not exhibiting the pattern. The present study was done to relate such differences in cognitive responding to cardiovascular changes during a dual-focus task. Heart rate and blood pressure were monitored in Types A and B male college students while they performed a color/word conflict primary task and a reaction-time secondary task. There were no differences in the behavioral performance of the Types A and B individuals. However, Types A and B subjects differed in mean heart rate, heart-rate variability, and phasic heart-rate pattern to the reaction-time stimuli. The reaction-time paradigm appears a fruitful base from which to explore cognitive/physiological response relations for Type A and Type B individuals.
最近的研究表明,表现出A型冠心病易发性行为模式的人在分配注意力时与未表现出该模式的人有所不同。本研究旨在探讨在双焦点任务中认知反应的此类差异与心血管变化之间的关系。在A型和B型男大学生执行颜色/单词冲突主要任务和反应时次要任务时,对他们的心率和血压进行了监测。A型和B型个体在行为表现上没有差异。然而,A型和B型受试者在平均心率、心率变异性以及对反应时刺激的心率相位模式方面存在差异。反应时范式似乎是一个富有成果的基础,可据此探索A型和B型个体的认知/生理反应关系。