• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为精神科门诊患者预后指标的末次魏斯罗夏克自我力量量表

The Last-Weiss Rorschach Ego-Strength Scale as a prognostic measure for psychiatric outpatients.

作者信息

Greenwald D F, Harder D W, Ritzler B A, Strauss J S, Kokes R F

机构信息

Northeastern University Medford, MA.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1988 Aug;67(1):199-207. doi: 10.2466/pms.1988.67.1.199.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1988.67.1.199
PMID:3211673
Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that the Last and Weiss (1976) Rorschach Ego-Strength Scale (sigma E) would predict outcome among a representative sample of never-hospitalized psychiatric outpatients. 78 patients were assessed with structured symptom, psychiatric history, and social data interviews at the time of initial clinic contact and at 2-yr. follow-up. Outcome measures included the Menninger Health-Sickness Scale, a multidimensional variable involving social and work functioning and recent symptom level, symptom measures, and an index of diagnostic severity. sigma E, controlled for number of responses, correlated significantly with Health-Sickness, neurotic symptoms, diagnostic severity, and psychotic symptomatology. Among the components of sigma E, M+, and FC+ had significant relationships or contributed to significant relations with outcome variables. Considered with an earlier study of inpatients, in which S+ sigma E component correlated inversely with outcome, this study suggested that sigma E components have differing prognostic significance, depending on adaptational level of the patient.

摘要

本研究检验了以下假设

Last和Weiss(1976年)的罗夏克自我力量量表(西格玛E)能够预测从未住院的精神科门诊患者代表性样本的预后。78名患者在初次门诊接触时以及随访2年时接受了结构化症状、精神病史和社会数据访谈评估。预后指标包括门宁格健康-疾病量表,这是一个涉及社会和工作功能以及近期症状水平的多维变量、症状指标以及诊断严重程度指数。控制反应数量后,西格玛E与健康-疾病、神经症症状、诊断严重程度和精神病症状学显著相关。在西格玛E的组成部分中,M+和FC+与预后变量有显著关系或促成了显著关系。结合早期一项针对住院患者的研究(其中S+西格玛E组成部分与预后呈负相关)来看,本研究表明西格玛E各组成部分具有不同的预后意义,这取决于患者的适应水平。

相似文献

1
The Last-Weiss Rorschach Ego-Strength Scale as a prognostic measure for psychiatric outpatients.作为精神科门诊患者预后指标的末次魏斯罗夏克自我力量量表
Percept Mot Skills. 1988 Aug;67(1):199-207. doi: 10.2466/pms.1988.67.1.199.
2
The Last-Weiss Rorschach Ego-Strength Scale as a prognostic measure for psychiatric inpatients.作为精神科住院患者预后指标的末次-魏斯罗夏克自我力量量表
J Pers Assess. 1988 Spring;52(1):106-15. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_10.
3
The Rorschach Ego Impairment Index in heterogeneous psychiatric patients.不同类型精神科患者的罗夏墨迹测验自我损伤指数
J Pers Assess. 1995 Dec;65(3):408-14. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_2.
4
A Meta-Analysis of the relationship between the Rorschach Ego Impairment Index (EII) and psychiatric severity.罗夏克墨迹测验的自我损害指数(EII)与精神疾病严重程度的关系的荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):464-85. doi: 10.1002/cpp.725. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
5
The Rorschach Comprehensive System Egocentricity Index in psychiatric inpatients.精神科住院患者的罗夏综合系统自我中心指数
J Pers Assess. 1985 Apr;49(2):137-40. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4902_5.
6
The Last and Weiss Rorschach Sum E in a normal sample.
Percept Mot Skills. 1990 Jun;70(3 Pt 1):889-90. doi: 10.2466/pms.1990.70.3.889.
7
The Rorschach Ego Impairment Index: prediction of treatment outcome in a child psychiatric population.罗夏克自我损害指数:儿童精神科群体治疗结果的预测
J Pers Assess. 2003 Aug;81(1):11-9. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8101_02.
8
An external construct validity study of Rorschach personality variables.罗夏克人格变量的外部结构效度研究。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):768-80. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674111.
9
A guide to research on the Rorschach prognostic rating scale.罗夏预后评定量表研究指南
J Pers Assess. 1977 Apr;41(2):117-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4102_1.
10
Influence of ego strength on associations of alexithymia and depression.自我力量对述情障碍与抑郁之间关联的影响。
Psychol Rep. 1996 Dec;79(3 Pt 1):999-1005. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1996.79.3.999.