Suppr超能文献

高尔夫推杆中的偏好-表现分离

Preference-Performance Dissociation in Golf Putting.

作者信息

Ziv Gal, Lidor Ronnie, Elbaz Liav, Lavie Matar

机构信息

Motor Behavior Laboratory, The Academic College at Wingate, Wingate Institute, Netanya, Israel.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 29;11:102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00102. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine the effectiveness of providing autonomy to learners and the phenomenon of preference-performance dissociation on a closed, self-paced motor task - putting in golf, when using different placements of a visual aid (a large circle) around a golf hole. Seventy-six participants were assigned to four experimental groups: (a) a visual aid placed behind the hole (V-behind group), (b) a visual aid placed in front of the hole (V-in-front group), (c) a visual aid placed around the hole (V-around group), and (d) a visual aid placed according to the participant's preference (V-pref group). Participants performed five pre-trials, 50 training putts from a distance of 2 m, a retention task (12 putts) from a distance of 2 m, and a transfer task (12 putts) from a distance of 2.5 m. The retention putts and transfer putts were performed 48 h after the training putts. The participants' subjective assessment of the helpfulness of the circle was also measured. It was found that in the retention task, putting consistency was lower in the V-in-front group compared to the V-around and V-pref groups. However, the subjective assessment of the helpfulness of the circle was higher in the V-in-front group. In addition, the low consistency of the V-in-front group was alleviated in the participants in the V-pref group who chose to place the circle in front of the hole. In contrast, the subjective assessment of the helpfulness of the circle was low in the V-in-front group. These findings suggest that while providing autonomy - that is, when the participant is able to choose for him/herself - can improve motor learning, there may be a dissociation between an individual's subjective assessment and the actual helpfulness of a visual aid. This dissociation may be termed , and coaches and instructors who teach closed, self-paced motor skills should be aware of the fact that when providing learners with the autonomy to choose a practice aid in order to improve their skills, some may not choose the aid that is effective for them.

摘要

本研究的目的是,在一项封闭的、自定节奏的运动任务——高尔夫推杆中,当在球洞周围使用视觉辅助工具(一个大圆圈)的不同放置方式时,考察给予学习者自主权的有效性以及偏好-表现分离现象。76名参与者被分配到四个实验组:(a)视觉辅助工具放置在球洞后方(V-后方组),(b)视觉辅助工具放置在球洞前方(V-前方组),(c)视觉辅助工具放置在球洞周围(V-周围组),以及(d)视觉辅助工具根据参与者的偏好放置(V-偏好组)。参与者进行了5次预试验、从2米距离进行50次训练推杆、从2米距离进行一次保持任务(12次推杆)以及从2.5米距离进行一次迁移任务(12次推杆)。保持推杆和迁移推杆在训练推杆48小时后进行。还测量了参与者对圆圈帮助程度的主观评估。结果发现,在保持任务中,与V-周围组和V-偏好组相比,V-前方组的推杆一致性较低。然而,V-前方组对圆圈帮助程度的主观评估较高。此外,在V-偏好组中选择将圆圈放置在球洞前方的参与者中,V-前方组的低一致性得到了缓解。相比之下,V-前方组对圆圈帮助程度的主观评估较低。这些发现表明,虽然给予自主权——即当参与者能够自己选择时——可以改善运动学习,但个人的主观评估与视觉辅助工具的实际帮助程度之间可能存在分离。这种分离可能被称为偏好-表现分离,并且教授封闭的、自定节奏运动技能的教练和指导员应该意识到这样一个事实,即当为学习者提供选择练习辅助工具的自主权以提高他们的技能时,有些人可能不会选择对他们有效的辅助工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验