Barzyk Philipp, Gruber Markus
Department of Sport Science, Human Performance Research Centre, University of Konstanz, Constance, Germany.
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Feb 14;6:1324615. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1324615. eCollection 2024.
Golf is a sport that consists of complex movement skills that need to be executed with utmost precision. Consequently, motor skill learning plays a crucial role in golf, and large numbers of studies address various methods of motor learning. In the present review, we give a systematic overview of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on motor learning of golf-specific motor skills. Three electronic databases were searched for RCTs looking at the effect of at least one learning method on performance in a golf-specific motor task. We grouped the studies depending on the learning strategies "cognitive training", "practice scheduling", "augmented feedback", "implicit and explicit learning" and "focus of attention". Fifty-two RCTs met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. Superior methods within their respective strategies were an external focus of attention and increasing contextual interference, as well as errorless learning. For "cognitive training" and "augmented feedback", no single method can be considered the most favorable. The overall biggest limitations were the lack of statistical power for more than half of the RCTs, and the fact that most studies of the present review investigated simple putting tasks in novices only. Although we have shown superiority of specific learning methods, transferability of the recommendations that can be derived from simple golf tasks in novices to sport-specific tasks in advanced players still has to be demonstrated and require study designs with the intention to provide practical recommendations for coaches and athletes in the sport of golf.
高尔夫是一项包含复杂运动技能的运动,这些技能需要极其精确地执行。因此,运动技能学习在高尔夫运动中起着至关重要的作用,并且大量研究探讨了各种运动学习方法。在本综述中,我们对关于高尔夫特定运动技能运动学习的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统概述。我们在三个电子数据库中搜索了RCT,这些试验考察了至少一种学习方法对高尔夫特定运动任务表现的影响。我们根据学习策略“认知训练”“练习安排”“增强反馈”“内隐和外显学习”以及“注意力焦点”对研究进行了分组。52项RCT符合纳入标准并被纳入系统综述。各自策略中的优越方法包括注意力的外部焦点、增加情境干扰以及无错误学习。对于“认知训练”和“增强反馈”,没有单一方法可被视为最有利的。总体而言,最大的局限性是超过一半的RCT缺乏统计效力,以及本综述中的大多数研究仅调查了新手的简单推杆任务。尽管我们已经证明了特定学习方法的优越性,但从新手简单高尔夫任务得出的建议向高级球员的特定运动任务的可转移性仍有待证明,并且需要研究设计以便为高尔夫运动中的教练和运动员提供实用建议。