First Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia.
Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Biomedical Center, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia.
Front Immunol. 2020 Feb 7;11:126. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00126. eCollection 2020.
Treatment with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has elicited considerable interest as an adjunctive therapy in sepsis. However, the encouraging effects of experiments with MSC in rodents have not been adequately studied in large-animal models with better relevance to human sepsis. Here, we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of bone marrow-derived MSCs in a clinically relevant porcine model of progressive peritonitis-induced sepsis. Thirty-two anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and instrumented pigs were randomly assigned into four groups ( = 8 per group): (1) sham-operated group (CONTROL); (2) sham-operated group treated with MSCs (MSC-CONTROL); (3) sepsis group with standard supportive care (SEPSIS); and (4) sepsis group treated with MSCs (MSC-SEPSIS). Peritoneal sepsis was induced by inoculating cultivated autologous feces. MSCs (1 × 10/kg) were administered intravenously at 6 h after sepsis induction. Before, 12, 18, and 24 h after the induction of peritonitis, we measured systemic, regional, and microvascular hemodynamics, multiple-organ functions, mitochondrial energy metabolism, systemic immune-inflammatory response, and oxidative stress. Administration of MSCs in the MSC-CONTROL group did not elicit any measurable acute effects. Treatment of septic animals with MSCs failed to mitigate sepsis-induced hemodynamic alterations or the gradual rise in Sepsis-related organ failure assessment scores. MSCs did not confer any protection against sepsis-mediated cellular myocardial depression and mitochondrial dysfunction. MSCs also failed to modulate the deregulated immune-inflammatory response. Intravenous administration of bone marrow-derived MSCs to healthy animals was well-tolerated. However, in this large-animal, clinically relevant peritonitis-induced sepsis model, MSCs were not capable of reversing any of the sepsis-induced disturbances in multiple biological, organ, and cellular systems.
间充质干细胞(MSCs)治疗作为一种辅助治疗方法在脓毒症中引起了相当大的关注。然而,在与人类脓毒症相关性更好的大动物模型中,对 MSC 进行的实验的令人鼓舞的效果尚未得到充分研究。 在这里,我们旨在评估骨髓来源的 MSC 在一种临床相关的进行性腹膜炎诱导的脓毒症猪模型中的安全性和疗效。 32 只麻醉、机械通气和仪器化的猪被随机分为四组(每组 8 只):(1)假手术组(CONTROL);(2)假手术组给予 MSC(MSC-CONTROL);(3)标准支持治疗的脓毒症组(SEPSIS);(4)给予 MSC 的脓毒症组(MSC-SEPSIS)。通过接种培养的自体粪便来诱导腹膜脓毒症。在脓毒症诱导后 6 小时静脉给予 MSC(1×10/kg)。 在腹膜炎诱导前、12、18 和 24 小时,我们测量了全身、局部和微血管血液动力学、多器官功能、线粒体能量代谢、全身免疫炎症反应和氧化应激。在 MSC-CONTROL 组中给予 MSC 没有引起任何可测量的急性作用。用 MSC 治疗脓毒症动物未能减轻脓毒症引起的血液动力学改变或逐渐升高的脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估评分。MSC 不能防止脓毒症介导的心肌抑制和线粒体功能障碍。MSC 也未能调节失调的免疫炎症反应。 静脉内给予骨髓来源的 MSC 给健康动物是耐受良好的。然而,在这种大动物、临床相关的腹膜炎诱导的脓毒症模型中,MSC 不能逆转任何一种脓毒症引起的多个生物、器官和细胞系统的紊乱。