Rai Archana N, Saini Nupur, Yadav Rashmi, Suprasanna P
1Nuclear Agriculture and Biotechnology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, 400085 India.
Department of Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, IGKV, Raipur, 492012 India.
3 Biotech. 2020 Mar;10(3):114. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-2106-9. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
Heat stress is one of the major limitations to crop productivity. In the present study, an efficient method of screening was adopted for identification of heat tolerant Indian Mustard genotypes by applying 4-day cycle of heat stress to seedlings. Thirty-four genotypes were screened based upon lipid peroxidation and survival percentage and classified them into five different classes according to membership function value (MFV) for response against high temperature. The maximum and minimum value of mean MFV were 0.89 (highly heat tolerant, TPM1) and 0.12 (highly heat sensitive, JM2), respectively. The coefficient of determination ( ) between the mean MFV and the heat tolerance index (HTI) of MDA content, survival percentage was 0.914 and 0.808 suggesting that these parameters are reliable traits to evaluate the heat tolerance of genotypes. The evaluation method was further validated using identified contrasting genotypes and assessment of heat stress associated biochemical parameters. Results showed efficient recovery of tolerant genotype as compared to sensitive genotype. Expression profiling of heat stress-related genes ( and ) showed significant upregulation in the tolerant genotype (TPM1) (9.73- and 4.87-fold, respectively) as compared to the sensitive genotype (JM2) (4.18- and 1.73-fold, respectively) under heat stress condition. The results imply development of an efficient screening method which is useful for evaluation and breeding of thermo-tolerant .
热胁迫是作物生产力的主要限制因素之一。在本研究中,采用了一种有效的筛选方法,通过对幼苗施加4天周期的热胁迫来鉴定耐热型印度芥菜基因型。基于脂质过氧化和存活率对34个基因型进行了筛选,并根据其对高温响应的隶属函数值(MFV)将它们分为五个不同类别。平均MFV的最大值和最小值分别为0.89(高度耐热,TPM1)和0.12(高度热敏感,JM2)。平均MFV与丙二醛(MDA)含量、存活率的耐热性指数(HTI)之间的决定系数分别为0.914和0.808,这表明这些参数是评估基因型耐热性的可靠指标。使用已鉴定的对比基因型和热胁迫相关生化参数的评估进一步验证了该评估方法。结果表明,与敏感基因型相比,耐受基因型能有效恢复。热胁迫相关基因( 和 )的表达谱分析表明,在热胁迫条件下,耐受基因型(TPM1)(分别为9.73倍和4.87倍)与敏感基因型(JM2)(分别为4.18倍和1.73倍)相比有显著上调。结果表明开发了一种有效的筛选方法,可用于耐热型 的评估和育种。