Suppr超能文献

在先前系统活检结果为阴性且直肠指检无异常的患者中,使用多参数磁共振成像与经直肠超声的认知融合进行靶向前列腺活检。

Targeted prostate biopsy using a cognitive fusion of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound in patients with previously negative systematic biopsies and non-suspicious digital rectal exam.

作者信息

Kuliš Tomislav, Zekulić Toni, Alduk Ana Marija, Lušić Mario, Bulimbašić Stela, Ferenčak Vladimir, Mokos Ivica, Hudolin Tvrtko, Kaštelan Željko

机构信息

Željko Kaštelan, Department of Urology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Kišpatićeva ulica 12, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia,

出版信息

Croat Med J. 2020 Feb 29;61(1):49-54. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2020.61.49.

Abstract

AIM

To compare cognitive fusion targeted and systematic prostate biopsy in patients with repeated negative systematic biopsy but persistent clinical suspicion for prostate cancer.

METHODS

The study enrolled 63 patients with at least one previously negative systematic biopsy who underwent targeted prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in addition to standardized systematic biopsy from July 2016 to May 2018. Multiparametric MRI was performed with 3 Tesla device by uro-radiologists experienced in prostate cancer. Lesions with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 3, 4, and 5 were considered suspicious. Targeted biopsies were performed with cognitive fusion of TRUS and mpMRI.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer detection, using either targeted or systematic biopsy, was 60.32%. Targeted biopsies were positive in 52.38% and systematic biopsies in 47.62% of patients. The median highest percentage of cancer involvement per biopsy core was significantly higher in targeted cylinders. The biopsies obtained by using the two techniques did not significantly differ in Gleason score.

CONCLUSION

Cognitive targeted prostate biopsy based on mpMRI presents a valuable addition to systematic biopsy in patients with repeated negative systematic biopsies but persistent clinical suspicion of prostate cancer.

摘要

目的

比较认知融合靶向活检与系统性前列腺活检在系统性活检反复阴性但临床仍持续怀疑前列腺癌的患者中的应用效果。

方法

该研究纳入了63例患者,这些患者之前至少有一次系统性活检结果为阴性,于2016年7月至2018年5月期间,除了接受标准化的系统性活检外,还采用多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)和经直肠超声(TRUS)进行了靶向前列腺活检。多参数MRI由经验丰富的前列腺癌泌尿放射科医生使用3特斯拉设备进行。前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)分类为3、4和5类的病变被视为可疑病变。靶向活检通过TRUS和mpMRI的认知融合进行。

结果

无论是靶向活检还是系统性活检,前列腺癌的检出率均为60.32%。52.38%的患者靶向活检呈阳性,47.62%的患者系统性活检呈阳性。靶向活检标本中每个活检核心的癌累及最高百分比中位数显著更高。两种技术获得的活检标本在Gleason评分上无显著差异。

结论

对于系统性活检反复阴性但临床仍持续怀疑前列腺癌的患者,基于mpMRI的认知靶向前列腺活检是系统性活检的一项有价值的补充。

相似文献

3
Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Feb;15(1):e33-e36. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer.
World J Oncol. 2019 Apr;10(2):63-89. doi: 10.14740/wjon1191. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
3
The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):343-356. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161684.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
6
EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
8
Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use.
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.038. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验