Comparative Study of Intercostal Nerve and Contralateral C7 Nerve Transfers for Elbow Extension After Global Brachial Plexus Avulsion.

INTRODUCTION

Elbow extensive reconstruction was essential for the patients with brachial plexus avulsion. Nerve transfer was applied to repair elbow extension, but the ultimate recovery was quite different. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of elbow extension in patients with global brachial plexus avulsion after repaired by intercostal nerve (ICN) and contralateral cervical 7 (cC7) nerve transfer to the long head branch of triceps and to analyze the possible influencing factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 24 patients treated with ICN and cC7 nerve transfer for elbow extension in posttraumatic global brachial plexus avulsion was carried out. Two ICNs were used as donors in 17 patients, and cC7 nerve was used in the other 7 patients. We evaluated the recovery of elbow extension by the British Medical Research Council grading system and electromyography. The correlation between age, preoperative interval, and prognosis was analyzed in this study.

RESULTS

Efficiency of elbow extensor strength in the ICN transfer group was 47.06%, and it was 28.57% in the cC7 nerve transfer group, but there was no significant difference (P = 0.653). The effective recovery of electromyography in ICN transfer group was 82.35%, whereas in the group cC7 nerve transfer, it was 28.57%, there was a statistical difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.021). Age and interval were negatively correlated with prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Intercostal nerve or cC7 nerve transfer to the long head branch of triceps could reconstruct elbow extension to some extent. Compared with cC7 nerve transfer, ICN transfer had a greater result for elbow extension, but the difference in extension power was not significant, whereas there was difference in electromyography recovery. Patient's age and interval were negatively correlated with the results.