Suppr超能文献

ZipTightTM在治疗急性肩锁关节脱位后维持复位有效吗?

Does the ZipTightTM effective to maintain reduction after the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation?

作者信息

Kurtoglu Alper, Sukur Erhan, Cicekli Ozgur, Daldal Ismail, Kochai Alauddin, Sen Zafer, Hali Abdullah

机构信息

Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim ve Araştirma Hastanesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dali, Sakarya.

Lokman Hekim Akay Hastanesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dali, Ankara.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19387. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019387.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study evaluated the functional and radiographic outcomes of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction performed using the mini-open technique and a knotless suspensory loop device METHODS:: A total of 25 patients (20 male and 5 female patients; mean age, 30.7 years; standard deviation, 10 years; range, 17-57 years) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study. A functional assessment was performed using the Constant and University of California Los Angeles score. The radiologic assessment included standard anterior-posterior views of the AC and coracoclavicular (CC) distances.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 18.6 months (range, 12-23 months). The mean Constant score was 87.2 ± 3.2, and the mean University of California Los Angeles score was 30.1 ± 2.4 at the final follow-up. Radiological evaluation at the last follow-up of the patients: Although there was no statistically significant increase in the AC and CC values of the patients () at the last follow-up, the average CC value in 6 (24%) of the 25 patients was greater than 50% compared with the unaffected side CC and early postoperative CC values. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the Constant and UCLA scores between the 6 patients with reduction loss and the 19 patients with reduction maintenance (P = .86).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical results of fixation of acute AC joint dislocations using the ZipTight knotless suspensory loop device system and mini-open technique were favorable in terms of functional recovery and pain relief. However, the major disadvantage of this method was radiological loss of AC joint reduction when compared to the contralateral shoulder.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了采用小切口技术和无结悬吊环装置进行急性肩锁关节(AC)重建的功能和影像学结果。方法:共有25例符合纳入标准的患者(20例男性和5例女性患者;平均年龄30.7岁;标准差10岁;年龄范围17 - 57岁)纳入本研究。使用Constant评分和加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分进行功能评估。影像学评估包括AC关节的标准前后位片和喙锁(CC)间距。

结果

平均随访期为18.6个月(范围12 - 23个月)。末次随访时,平均Constant评分为87.2 ± 3.2,平均UCLA评分为30.1 ± 2.4。患者末次随访时的影像学评估:虽然患者的AC和CC值在末次随访时无统计学显著增加,但25例患者中有6例(24%)的平均CC值与未受影响侧CC值和术后早期CC值相比大于50%。然而,6例复位丢失患者和19例复位维持患者之间的Constant和UCLA评分无统计学显著差异(P = 0.86)。

结论

使用ZipTight无结悬吊环装置系统和小切口技术固定急性AC关节脱位的临床结果在功能恢复和疼痛缓解方面良好。然而,与对侧肩部相比,该方法的主要缺点是AC关节复位的影像学丢失。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fc/7478414/97517de38504/medi-99-e19387-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验