Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Feb;27(2):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.032. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
Rapid initiation of antibiotic treatment is considered crucial in patients with severe infections such as septic shock and bacterial meningitis, but may not be as important for other infectious syndromes. A better understanding of which patients can tolerate a delay in start of therapy is important for antibiotic stewardship purposes.
To explore the existing evidence on the impact of time to antibiotics on clinical outcomes in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with bacterial infections of different severity of illness and source of infection.
A literature search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE database using combined search terms for various infectious syndromes (sepsis/septic shock, bacterial meningitis, lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, intra-abdominal infections and skin and soft tissue infections), time to antibiotic treatment, and clinical outcome.
The literature search generated 8828 hits. After screening titles and abstracts and assessing potentially relevant full-text papers, 60 original articles (four randomized controlled trials, 43 observational studies) were included. Most articles addressed sepsis/septic shock, while few studies evaluated early initiation of therapy in mild to moderate disease. The lack of randomized trials and the risk of confounding factors and biases in observational studies warrant caution in the interpretation of results. We conclude that the literature supports prompt administration of effective antibiotics for septic shock and bacterial meningitis, but there is no clear evidence showing that a delayed start of therapy is associated with worse outcome for less severe infectious syndromes.
For patients presenting with suspected bacterial infections, withholding antibiotic therapy until diagnostic results are available and a diagnosis has been established (e.g. by 4-8 h) seems acceptable in most cases unless septic shock or bacterial meningitis are suspected. This approach promotes the use of ecologically favourable antibiotics in the ED, reducing the risks of side effects and selection of resistance.
在患有严重感染(如败血症性休克和细菌性脑膜炎)的患者中,迅速开始抗生素治疗被认为至关重要,但对于其他感染综合征可能并不那么重要。更好地了解哪些患者可以耐受治疗开始的延迟,对于抗生素管理目的很重要。
探讨不同严重程度和感染源的细菌性感染患者在急诊科就诊时抗生素使用时间对临床结局的影响。
在 PubMed/MEDLINE 数据库中,使用各种感染综合征(败血症/败血症性休克、细菌性脑膜炎、下呼吸道感染、尿路感染、腹腔内感染和皮肤软组织感染)、抗生素治疗时间和临床结局的联合检索词进行文献检索。
文献检索产生了 8828 个结果。经过筛选标题和摘要,并评估潜在相关的全文文章后,纳入了 60 篇原始文章(四项随机对照试验,43 项观察性研究)。大多数文章涉及败血症/败血症性休克,而很少有研究评估轻度至中度疾病中早期开始治疗。缺乏随机试验和观察性研究中的混杂因素和偏倚风险,需要谨慎解释结果。我们得出结论,文献支持败血症性休克和细菌性脑膜炎患者及时使用有效抗生素,但没有明确证据表明延迟开始治疗与较轻感染综合征的结局较差相关。
对于疑似细菌性感染的患者,在获得诊断结果并确定诊断(例如在 4-8 小时内)之前,似乎可以接受等待抗生素治疗,除非怀疑是败血症性休克或细菌性脑膜炎。这种方法在急诊科促进了生态友好型抗生素的使用,降低了不良反应和耐药性选择的风险。