Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung.
Department of Psychiatry & Brain Disease Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung.
J Psychopharmacol. 2020 May;34(5):495-505. doi: 10.1177/0269881120908016. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
Sarcosine (N-methylglycine), a type 1 glycine transporter inhibitor (GlyT1), has shown therapeutic potential for treating schizophrenia; however, studies have reported conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and cognitive effect of sarcosine for schizophrenia.
In this study, PubMed, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials were searched electronically for double-blinded randomised controlled trials that used sarcosine for treating schizophrenia. We used the published trials up to November 2019 to investigate the efficacy of sarcosine in schizophrenia. We pooled studies by using a random-effect model for comparing sarcosine treatment effects. Patients who were diagnosed with schizophrenia according to the criteria of the were recruited. Clinical improvement and cognitive function scores between baseline and after sarcosine use were compared using the standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The heterogeneity of the included trials was evaluated through visual inspection of funnel plots and through the statistic.
We identified seven trials with 326 participants with schizophrenia meeting the inclusion criteria. All these studies evaluated the overall clinical symptoms, and four of them evaluated overall cognitive functions. Sarcosine use achieved more significant effects than the use of its comparators in relieving overall clinical symptoms (SMD = 0.51, CI = 0.26-0.76, < 0.01). Moreover, studies with the low Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale range of 70-79 showed significant effect size (ES)s of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.03-1.31, = 0.04). In addition, trials enrolling patients with stable clinical symptoms had significant ESs: 0.53 (95% CI: 0.21-0.85, < 0.01). Add-on sarcosine combined with first- and second-generation antipsychotics, except clozapine, had a positive effect. For overall cognitive functions, sarcosine showed a positive but insignificant effect compared with its comparators (SMD = 0.27, CI = -0.06 to 0.60, = 0.10). The effects were correlated with increased female proportions and decreased illness duration, albeit nonsignificantly.
The meta-analysis suggests that sarcosine may be associated with treatment effect on overall clinical symptoms in patients with schizophrenia but not cognitive functions.
肌氨酸(N-甲基甘氨酸)是一种 1 型甘氨酸转运蛋白抑制剂(GlyT1),在治疗精神分裂症方面显示出了治疗潜力;然而,研究结果却相互矛盾。本荟萃分析旨在探讨肌氨酸治疗精神分裂症的疗效和认知作用。
本研究通过电子检索 PubMed、Cochrane 系统评价和 Cochrane 协作组对照临床试验注册库,寻找使用肌氨酸治疗精神分裂症的双盲随机对照试验。我们使用截至 2019 年 11 月的已发表试验,以调查肌氨酸在精神分裂症中的疗效。我们采用随机效应模型对肌氨酸治疗效果进行汇总研究。入组患者根据 的标准被诊断为精神分裂症。采用标准化均数差(SMD)及 95%置信区间(CI)比较基线和肌氨酸使用后患者的临床改善和认知功能评分。通过可视化漏斗图和 统计量评估纳入试验的异质性。
我们确定了 7 项符合纳入标准的研究,共纳入 326 例精神分裂症患者。所有这些研究均评估了整体临床症状,其中 4 项研究评估了整体认知功能。与对照组相比,肌氨酸的使用在缓解整体临床症状方面具有更显著的效果(SMD=0.51,CI=0.26-0.76, < 0.01)。此外,阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)评分范围在 70-79 分的研究显示出显著的效应量(ES)为 0.67(95%CI:0.03-1.31, = 0.04)。此外,纳入临床症状稳定的患者的试验具有显著的 ES:0.53(95%CI:0.21-0.85, < 0.01)。除氯氮平外,肌氨酸联合第一代和第二代抗精神病药的添加具有积极作用。对于整体认知功能,肌氨酸与对照组相比显示出积极但不显著的效果(SMD=0.27,CI=-0.06-0.60, = 0.10)。尽管没有统计学意义,但这些效果与女性比例的增加和疾病持续时间的减少有关。
荟萃分析表明,肌氨酸可能与精神分裂症患者的整体临床症状治疗效果有关,但与认知功能无关。