From the Departments of Radiology (W.H.K., H.J.K.), Surgery (C.S.P., J.L., H.Y.P., J.H.J., W.W.K.), and Oncology/Hematology (Y.S.C., S.J.L.), School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, 807 Hoguk-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 41404, Republic of Korea; and Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, South Korea (S.H.K.).
Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):275-282. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191639. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
Background After publication of the findings of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1071 trial, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been increasingly performed in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Purpose To investigate the pretreatment breast MRI and clinical-pathologic characteristics associated with failed sentinel node identification after NAC in patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods Patients who underwent SLNB after NAC between January 2015 and January 2019 were retrospectively identified. Two radiologists independently reviewed the characteristics of axillary nodes (number, perinodal infiltration, cortical thickness, and maximal diameter) at pretreatment breast MRI. The associations of the clinical-pathologic and imaging characteristics of the axillary nodes with sentinel node identification were assessed by using the χ test and/or the χ test for trend and multivariable logistic regression with odds ratio (OR) calculation. Results A total of 276 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 48 years ± 9; range, 27-68 years) were included. Sentinel nodes were identified in 252 of the 276 patients (91%). Multivariable analysis showed that higher (stage 3 or 4) clinical T stages (OR = 5.2, = .004 for radiologist 1; OR = 4.6, = .01 for radiologist 2), use of a single tracer (OR = 4.3, = .04 for radiologist 1; OR = 3.9, = .046 for radiologist 2), a greater number (10 or more) of suspicious axillary nodes (OR = 11.5, = .002 for radiologist 1; OR = 8.3, = .01 for radiologist 2), and the presence of perinodal infiltration (OR = 7.0, = .002 for radiologist 1; OR = 7.5, = .003 for radiologist 2) were associated with failed sentinel node identification. Conclusion A greater number of suspicious axillary nodes and the presence of perinodal infiltration at pretreatment MRI, higher clinical T stages, and use of a single tracer were independently associated with failed sentinel node identification after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by Imbriaco in this issue.
背景 在发表了美国外科医师学院肿瘤学组 Z1071 试验的结果后,新辅助化疗(NAC)后越来越多的乳腺癌患者进行了前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)。目的 探讨乳腺癌患者 NAC 后前哨淋巴结活检失败与术前乳腺 MRI 和临床病理特征的关系。材料与方法 回顾性分析 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月间接受 NAC 后 SLNB 的患者。两位放射科医生独立回顾术前乳腺 MRI 腋窝淋巴结(数量、周围浸润、皮质厚度和最大直径)的特征。使用卡方检验和/或卡方趋势检验以及多变量逻辑回归计算比值比(OR)评估腋窝淋巴结的临床病理和影像学特征与前哨淋巴结识别的关系。结果 共纳入 276 例女性(平均年龄±标准差,48 岁±9;范围,27-68 岁)。276 例患者中有 252 例(91%)识别出前哨淋巴结。多变量分析显示,较高的临床 T 分期(分期 3 或 4)(放射科医生 1 的 OR = 5.2, =.004;放射科医生 2 的 OR = 4.6, =.01)、使用单一示踪剂(放射科医生 1 的 OR = 4.3, =.04;放射科医生 2 的 OR = 3.9, =.046)、更多可疑腋窝淋巴结(数量 10 个或更多)(放射科医生 1 的 OR = 11.5, =.002;放射科医生 2 的 OR = 8.3, =.01)和存在周围浸润(放射科医生 1 的 OR = 7.0, =.002;放射科医生 2 的 OR = 7.5, =.003)与前哨淋巴结活检失败相关。结论 在接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者中,术前 MRI 中可疑腋窝淋巴结数量较多、存在周围浸润、临床 T 分期较高以及使用单一示踪剂与前哨淋巴结活检失败独立相关。