• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估儿科 1 型糖尿病中辅助医疗保健专业人员的时间:与临床因素、技术和社会决定因素的关联。

Assessing Allied Health-Care Professional Time in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Associations With Clinical Factors, Technology and Social Determinants.

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Diabetes. 2020 Jul;44(5):387-393. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.11.004
PMID:32127293
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The factors associated with allied health-care professional (HCP) time spent face-to-face with patients in clinic have not been well described in type 1 diabetes (T1D) given the introduction of resource-intensive technologies and gaps in socioeconomic circumstances. The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical and social factors associated with nonphysician HCP time in a pediatric T1D practice.

METHODS

Nonphysician HCP workload data, including time spent in direct clinical care over a 1-year period and nonclinic contacts, were linked to data from 723 pediatric subjects with T1D and evaluated in relation to key demographic, social and diabetes treatment factors.

RESULTS

HCPs spent 145.7 min per patient on a median of 3 clinic visits, with certified diabetes educators (CDEs) being responsible for most clinic interactions compared with psychosocial staff. CDE time varied considerably according to T1D duration, with new-onset patients (≤1 year) taking a median of 392.0 min compared with 114.5 min for their established counterparts (p<0.0001). Among the established group (n=629), CDE time was strongly associated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy initiation, psychosocial service use, glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and degree of marginalization (p<0.0001). Overall, CDE time increased by 8.6 min for each 1.0% increase in A1C (p=0.022) and by 16.3 min for each 1-U increase in marginalization (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed HCP time was associated with multiple clinical factors in addition to overall marginalization. Although initial investments in education and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion training were considerable, our results suggest that these lead to a decrease in time spent in clinic over time, and is largely driven by lower A1C.

摘要

目的

由于引入了资源密集型技术和社会经济状况存在差距,1 型糖尿病(T1D)中尚未很好地描述与医疗保健专业人员(HCP)在诊所面对面花费的时间相关的因素。本研究的目的是评估儿科 T1D 实践中与非医师 HCP 时间相关的临床和社会因素。

方法

将非医师 HCP 工作量数据(包括在 1 年期间花费在直接临床护理上的时间和非诊所接触)与 723 名 T1D 儿科患者的数据相关联,并根据关键的人口统计学,社会和糖尿病治疗因素进行评估。

结果

HCP 平均每个患者在 3 次就诊中花费 145.7 分钟,与心理社会工作人员相比,认证糖尿病教育者(CDE)负责大多数诊所互动。CDE 时间差异很大,新发病患者(≤1 年)中位数为 392.0 分钟,而新发病患者(≤1 年)中位数为 392.0 分钟。相比之下,对于已经建立的患者(n=629),CDE 时间与持续皮下胰岛素输注疗法的启动,心理社会服务的使用,糖化血红蛋白(A1C)和边缘化程度密切相关(p<0.0001)。总体而言,CDE 时间随 A1C 每增加 1.0%而增加 8.6 分钟(p=0.022),随边缘化程度每增加 1.0 个单位而增加 16.3 分钟(p=0.01)。

结论

我们观察到,HCP 的时间除了总体边缘化之外,还与多种临床因素相关。尽管在教育和持续皮下胰岛素输注培训方面的初始投资相当可观,但我们的研究结果表明,这些投资随着时间的推移会导致在诊所花费的时间减少,而这主要是由于 A1C 降低所致。

相似文献

1
Assessing Allied Health-Care Professional Time in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Associations With Clinical Factors, Technology and Social Determinants.评估儿科 1 型糖尿病中辅助医疗保健专业人员的时间:与临床因素、技术和社会决定因素的关联。
Can J Diabetes. 2020 Jul;44(5):387-393. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
2
[The Impact of Prolonged Use of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion in the Control of Type-1 Diabetes].[持续皮下胰岛素输注长期使用对1型糖尿病控制的影响]
Acta Med Port. 2019 Feb 1;32(1):17-24. doi: 10.20344/amp.10778.
3
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in children and young people at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: the SCIPI RCT.1 型糖尿病诊断时采用连续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下注射胰岛素治疗儿童和青少年:SCIPI RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(42):1-112. doi: 10.3310/hta22420.
4
Healthcare professional requirements for the care of adult diabetes patients managed with insulin pumps in Australia.
Intern Med J. 2015 Jan;45(1):86-93. doi: 10.1111/imj.12619.
5
Memory of insulin pumps and their record as a source of information about insulin therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.胰岛素泵的记忆功能及其作为1型糖尿病儿童和青少年胰岛素治疗信息来源的记录。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005 Apr;7(2):308-14. doi: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.308.
6
Insulin pump use in young children in the T1D Exchange clinic registry is associated with lower hemoglobin A1c levels than injection therapy.在1型糖尿病交换诊所登记处,幼儿使用胰岛素泵与糖化血红蛋白水平低于注射治疗相关。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Dec;15(8):564-72. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12121. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
7
Glycemic control and self-rated health among ethnically diverse adolescents with type 1 diabetes.血糖控制与不同族裔青少年 1 型糖尿病患者的自我健康评价。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2020 Feb;21(1):69-76. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12928. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
8
Socioeconomic Disparities in Glycemic Management in Children and Youth With Type 1 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.1型糖尿病儿童和青少年血糖管理中的社会经济差异:一项回顾性队列研究
Can J Diabetes. 2023 Dec;47(8):658-664.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2023.07.005. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
9
Diabetes Technology Use Among Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women with T1D in the T1D Exchange.T1D 交换研究中 T1D 孕妇和非孕妇的糖尿病技术使用情况。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Aug;20(8):517-523. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0033. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
10
Is diabetic ketoacidosis a good predictor of 5-year metabolic control in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes?新诊断为 1 型糖尿病的儿童中,糖尿病酮症酸中毒是否是 5 年代谢控制的良好预测指标?
BMC Endocr Disord. 2021 Nov 2;21(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00882-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Care for People Living With Dementia and Diabetes: Applying the Human-Centered Design Process to Continuous Glucose Monitoring.改善痴呆症和糖尿病患者的护理:将以人为本的设计流程应用于持续血糖监测。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan;18(1):201-206. doi: 10.1177/19322968221137907. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
2
ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetes education in children and adolescents.《国际儿童青少年糖尿病研究学会(ISPAD)2022年临床实践共识指南:儿童和青少年糖尿病教育》
Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 Dec;23(8):1229-1242. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13418.