Suppr超能文献

在“展望”研究中,通过贝克抑郁量表(BDI)和患者健康问卷(PHQ)量表测量的抑郁症症状患病率差异。

Symptom prevalence differences of depression as measured by BDI and PHQ scales in the Look AHEAD study.

作者信息

Vaughan Elizabeth M, Johnston Craig A, Moreno Jennette P, Cheskin Lawrence J, Dutton Gareth R, Gee Molly, Gaussoin Sarah A, Knowler William C, Rejeski W Jack, Wadden Thomas A, Yanovski Susan Z, Foreyt John P

机构信息

Department of Medicine Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas.

Department of Health and Human Performance University of Houston Houston Texas.

出版信息

Obes Sci Pract. 2019 Dec 19;6(1):28-38. doi: 10.1002/osp4.378. eCollection 2020 Feb.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare depressive symptomatology as assessed by two frequently used measures, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-1A) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).

METHODS

Investigators conducted a cross-sectional secondary analysis of data collected as part of the follow-up observational phase of the Look AHEAD study. Rates of agreement between the BDI-1A and PHQ-9 were calculated, and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between differing depression category classifications and demographic factors (ie, age, sex, race/ethnicity) or comorbidities (ie, diabetes control, cardiovascular disease).

RESULTS

A high level of agreement (κ = 0.47, 95% CI (0.43 to 0.50)) was found in the level of depressive symptomatology between the BDI-1A and PHQ-9. Differing classifications (minimal, mild, moderate, and severe) occurred in 16.8% of the sample. Higher scores on the somatic subscale of the BDI-1A were significantly associated with disagreement as were having a history of cardiovascular disease, lower health-related quality of life, and minority racial/ethnic classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Either the BDI-1A or PHQ-9 can be used to assess depressive symptomatology in adults with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes. However, further assessment should be considered in those with related somatic symptoms, decreased quality of life, and in racial/ethnic minority populations.

摘要

目的

比较两种常用测量工具——贝克抑郁量表(BDI - 1A)和患者健康问卷(PHQ - 9)所评估的抑郁症状学。

方法

研究人员对作为“展望未来”(Look AHEAD)研究随访观察阶段一部分所收集的数据进行了横断面二次分析。计算了BDI - 1A和PHQ - 9之间的一致性率,并使用多变量逻辑回归来检验不同抑郁类别分类与人口统计学因素(即年龄、性别、种族/族裔)或合并症(即糖尿病控制、心血管疾病)之间的关系。

结果

BDI - 1A和PHQ - 9在抑郁症状学水平上具有高度一致性(κ = 0.47,95%可信区间(0.43至0.50))。16.8%的样本出现了不同的分类(轻微、轻度、中度和重度)。BDI - 1A躯体子量表得分较高与不一致显著相关,心血管疾病史、较低的健康相关生活质量以及少数种族/族裔分类也与之相关。

结论

BDI - 1A或PHQ - 9均可用于评估超重/肥胖和2型糖尿病成人的抑郁症状学。然而,对于有相关躯体症状、生活质量下降的人群以及种族/族裔少数群体,应考虑进一步评估。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验