Maharaj Shivesh, Mungul Sheetal, Laher Abdullah
Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, School of Neurosciences, Department of Otolaryngology University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Jan 23;5(1):37-45. doi: 10.1002/lio2.350. eCollection 2020 Feb.
In the management of parotid sialocele and fistula, various conservative and surgical methods have been described. Some studies have described the use of Botulinum toxin A (Botox A) for the management of parotid sialocele and fistula. This is a less invasive and potentially equally effective option. We therefore conducted a systematic review on the current body of literature relating to this specific use of Botox A.
A search strategy was conducted in July 2019 using the following electronic databases: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. A search of all articles from inception until 31 August 2019 was performed.
Literature searches of electronic databases identified 67 articles eligible for review, of which 15 fulfilled all criteria. These studies were small and in total only 47 patients were included. The majority of sialoceles and fistulas presented as a complication of surgery (77%) with the remaining cases occurring as a result of trauma. The typical age at presentation was between 32 and 88 years of age (mean age of 52 years). All patients were initially treated with and failed other conservative measures. Botox A injection was considered as a final conservative treatment option. The toxin was administered percutaneously in all cases of parotid sialocele and fistula. Dosage of Botox ranged from 10 to 200 units with majority of patients (58%) requiring only one injection. The overall success rate for patients treated with Botox A injections ranged between 70 and 100% for parotid sialoceles and fistulas.
Botox A injections are successful in the treatment of parotid sialoceles and fistulas and should be considered before the use of invasive conventional options. Further studies with larger numbers are needed to ratify this recommendation. Success rate for patients, treated with Botox A injection was between 70 and 100% for parotid sialocele and fistula. Patients who failed initial treatment with Botox A were re-administered with Botox A and eventually resolved.
在腮腺涎瘘和涎瘘的管理中,已描述了各种保守和手术方法。一些研究描述了使用A型肉毒杆菌毒素(Botox A)来管理腮腺涎瘘和涎瘘。这是一种侵入性较小且可能同样有效的选择。因此,我们对当前与Botox A的这种特定用途相关的文献进行了系统综述。
2019年7月使用以下电子数据库进行了检索策略:Cochrane系统评价数据库、EMBASE、谷歌学术、PubMed、Scopus和科学网。对从创刊到2019年8月31日的所有文章进行了检索。
电子数据库的文献检索确定了67篇符合综述条件的文章,其中15篇符合所有标准。这些研究规模较小,总共仅纳入了47例患者。大多数涎瘘和涎瘘表现为手术并发症(77%),其余病例是由创伤引起的。出现症状的典型年龄在32至88岁之间(平均年龄52岁)。所有患者最初均接受了其他保守措施治疗但失败。Botox A注射被视为最终的保守治疗选择。在所有腮腺涎瘘和涎瘘病例中,毒素均经皮给药。Botox的剂量范围为10至200单位,大多数患者(58%)仅需注射一次。接受Botox A注射治疗的患者,腮腺涎瘘和涎瘘的总体成功率在70%至100%之间。
Botox A注射治疗腮腺涎瘘和涎瘘是成功的,在使用侵入性传统方法之前应予以考虑。需要更多数量的进一步研究来证实这一建议。接受Botox A注射治疗的患者,腮腺涎瘘和涎瘘的成功率在70%至100%之间。最初接受Botox A治疗失败的患者再次接受Botox A治疗并最终治愈。