Department of Chemistry and the Center for Molecular Study of Condensed Soft Matter, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, USA.
Department of Physics and the Center for Molecular Study of Condensed Soft Matter, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, USA.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Apr 17;48(7):3591-3604. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa121.
Linker histones are epigenetic regulators that bind to nucleosomes and alter chromatin structures and dynamics. Biophysical studies have revealed two binding modes in the linker histone/nucleosome complex, the chromatosome, where the linker histone is either centered on or askew from the dyad axis. Each has been posited to have distinct effects on chromatin, however the molecular and thermodynamic mechanisms that drive them and their dependence on linker histone compositions remain poorly understood. We present molecular dynamics simulations of chromatosomes with the globular domain of two linker histone variants, generic H1 (genGH1) and H1.0 (GH1.0), to determine how their differences influence chromatosome structures, energetics and dynamics. Results show that both unbound linker histones adopt a single compact conformation. Upon binding, DNA flexibility is reduced, resulting in increased chromatosome compaction. While both variants enthalpically favor on-dyad binding, energetic benefits are significantly higher for GH1.0, suggesting that GH1.0 is more capable than genGH1 of overcoming the large entropic reduction required for on-dyad binding which helps rationalize experiments that have consistently demonstrated GH1.0 in on-dyad states but that show genGH1 in both locations. These simulations highlight the thermodynamic basis for different linker histone binding motifs, and details their physical and chemical effects on chromatosomes.
连接组蛋白是一种表观遗传调节剂,可与核小体结合并改变染色质结构和动力学。生物物理研究揭示了连接组蛋白/核小体复合物中两种结合模式,即染色质小体,其中连接组蛋白位于或偏离二联体轴。每种模式都被认为对染色质有不同的影响,但是驱动它们的分子和热力学机制及其对连接组蛋白组成的依赖性仍知之甚少。我们使用两种连接组蛋白变体(通用 H1(genGH1)和 H1.0(GH1.0))的球形结构域进行了染色质小体的分子动力学模拟,以确定它们的差异如何影响染色质小体的结构、能量和动力学。结果表明,两种未结合的连接组蛋白均采用单一紧凑构象。结合后,DNA 的柔韧性降低,导致染色质小体的紧凑性增加。虽然两种变体在焓上都有利于二联体结合,但 GH1.0 的能量优势明显更高,这表明 GH1.0 比 genGH1 更能够克服二联体结合所需的大熵减少,这有助于解释实验,这些实验一致表明 GH1.0 处于二联体状态,但表明 genGH1 存在于两个位置。这些模拟突出了不同连接组蛋白结合基序的热力学基础,并详细说明了它们对染色质小体的物理和化学影响。