• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

22G 与 19G 针在超声内镜引导下经皮肝脏穿刺活检中的对比研究:更细的针更好吗?

A Comparative Study of 22G versus 19G Needles for EUS-Guided Biopsies for Parenchymal Liver Disease: Are Thinner Needles Better?

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-3082, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Jan;66(1):238-246. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06165-x. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-020-06165-x
PMID:32128647
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Data on comparative efficacy of various available endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) needles are limited. We sought to compare the performance of a novel Franseen-tip 22G fine-needle biopsy (FNB) device to that of 19G needle platforms for liver parenchyma.

METHODS

Consecutive patients referred for EUS and suspected to have hepatic parenchymal disease underwent EUS-LB using different EUS needles and were included in this retrospective study. Two blinded expert liver pathologists independently reviewed and reported on: total number of tissue fragments, length of longest fragment, number of complete and incomplete portal tracts (CPT and IPT), and specimen adequacy.

RESULTS

A 22G Franseen-tip needle (A) was used in 30 patients; 19G Tru-Cut needle (B) in 50 patients; 19G reverse beveled non-Tru-Cut needle (C) in 27 patients; and a 19G flexible non-Tru-Cut needle (D) in 28 patients. In the order of needles, A, B, C and D,  > 10 tissue fragments were obtained in 100%, 6%, 82%, and 96% samples, the mean number of CPTs was 6.9; 3.0; 7.3; and 16.9, length of longest fragment was 3.8, 4. 7, 3.9, and 8.4 mm, and specimen adequacy was 66.7%, 46%, 82.1%, and 81.5%, respectively. A positive correlation was obtained between number of CPTs and length of longest fragment in samples accrued by 19G needles.

CONCLUSION

EUS-LB specimens using 22G Franseen-tip needle appear highly fragmented, leading to inferior specimen adequacy compared to 19G non-Tru-Cut needles. We also report on using length of longest fragment as an additional criterion for specimen adequacy as it positively correlates with number of CPTs standard.

摘要

背景与目的

目前关于各种可用的内镜超声引导下肝活检(EUS-LB)针的比较疗效的数据有限。我们旨在比较新型 Franseen 尖端 22G 细针活检(FNB)装置与 19G 针平台在肝实质方面的性能。

方法

连续入组因 EUS 检查并疑似肝实质疾病而行 EUS-LB 的患者,并纳入本回顾性研究。两名盲法肝脏病理学家独立回顾和报告:总组织碎片数量、最长碎片长度、完整和不完整门脉通道(CPT 和 IPT)的数量以及标本充足性。

结果

30 例患者使用 22G Franseen 尖端针(A);50 例患者使用 19G Tru-Cut 针(B);27 例患者使用 19G 反向斜面非 Tru-Cut 针(C);28 例患者使用 19G 弹性非 Tru-Cut 针(D)。按针的顺序 A、B、C 和 D,100%、6%、82%和 96%的样本获得>10 个组织碎片,CPT 的平均数量分别为 6.9;3.0;7.3;16.9,最长碎片长度分别为 3.8;4.7;3.9;8.4mm,标本充足性分别为 66.7%;46%;82.1%;81.5%。19G 针采集的样本中,CPT 的数量与最长碎片的长度之间存在正相关。

结论

与 19G 非 Tru-Cut 针相比,EUS-LB 标本使用 22G Franseen 尖端针时碎片高度破碎,导致标本充足性较差。我们还报告了使用最长碎片长度作为标本充足性的附加标准,因为它与 CPT 数量呈正相关。

相似文献

1
A Comparative Study of 22G versus 19G Needles for EUS-Guided Biopsies for Parenchymal Liver Disease: Are Thinner Needles Better?22G 与 19G 针在超声内镜引导下经皮肝脏穿刺活检中的对比研究:更细的针更好吗?
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Jan;66(1):238-246. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06165-x. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
2
Comparison of Two Specialized Histology Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Liver Biopsy: A Pilot Study.两种专门的组织学针在超声内镜(EUS)引导下肝活检中的比较:一项初步研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 May;66(5):1700-1706. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06391-3. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
3
Optimizing EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: comprehensive assessment of needle types and tissue acquisition techniques.优化超声内镜引导下肝活检采样:针型与组织获取技术的综合评估
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Feb;85(2):419-426. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.07.065. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
4
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy in chronic liver disease: a randomized comparison of 19-G FNA and 22-G FNB needles.内镜超声引导下活检在慢性肝病中的应用:19G细针穿刺抽吸与22G细针活检针的随机对照研究
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Jan;7(1):E62-E71. doi: 10.1055/a-0655-7462. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
5
Comparison of diagnostic outcomes, safety, and cost of Franseen-tip 19G versus 22G needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsies.Franseen尖端19G与22G针用于内镜超声引导下肝活检的诊断结果、安全性及成本比较。
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Feb 28;12(2):E291-E296. doi: 10.1055/a-2226-1337. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors: Is Bigger Better?19G 与 22G 抽吸针在超声内镜引导下对黏膜下肿瘤进行细针穿刺活检的比较:更大是否更好?
J Ultrasound Med. 2024 Apr;43(4):761-770. doi: 10.1002/jum.16405. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
7
19 G aspiration needle versus 19 G core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a prospective randomized trial.19G 抽吸针与 19G 核心活检针用于超声内镜引导下肝活检:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Endoscopy. 2019 Nov;51(11):1059-1065. doi: 10.1055/a-0956-6922. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
8
A prospective, head-to-head comparison of 2 EUS-guided liver biopsy needles in vivo.前瞻性、头对头比较两种 EUS 引导下肝脏活检针的体内研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 May;93(5):1133-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.050. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
9
Comparing a 19-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle with a 22-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle for EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: a prospective randomized study.对比 19 号和 22 号细针活检针对超声内镜引导下肝脏活检采样的效果:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jun;99(6):931-937. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.022. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
10
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy using a 22-G fine needle biopsy needle: a prospective study.内镜超声引导下使用 22G 细针活检针进行肝活检:一项前瞻性研究。
Endoscopy. 2019 Sep;51(9):818-824. doi: 10.1055/a-0967-3640. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinct ways to perform a liver biopsy: The core technique setups and updated understanding of these modalities.进行肝活检的不同方法:核心技术设置及对这些方式的最新认识。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2023 Nov-Dec;12(6):437-444. doi: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000035. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
2
Comparison of diagnostic outcomes, safety, and cost of Franseen-tip 19G versus 22G needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsies.Franseen尖端19G与22G针用于内镜超声引导下肝活检的诊断结果、安全性及成本比较。
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Feb 28;12(2):E291-E296. doi: 10.1055/a-2226-1337. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Endohepatology: The endoscopic armamentarium in the hand of the hepatologist.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy using a 22-G fine needle biopsy needle: a prospective study.内镜超声引导下使用 22G 细针活检针进行肝活检:一项前瞻性研究。
Endoscopy. 2019 Sep;51(9):818-824. doi: 10.1055/a-0967-3640. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
2
Comparison of EUS-guided versus percutaneous and transjugular approaches for the performance of liver biopsies.超声内镜引导下与经皮及经颈静脉途径进行肝脏活检的比较。
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Jun;51(6):826-830. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
3
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy in chronic liver disease: a randomized comparison of 19-G FNA and 22-G FNB needles.
内科学:肝病学家手中的内镜设备。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 1;30(1):4-13. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_214_23. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
4
Detection value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided 19G fine-needle wet-heparinized suction for pancreatic solid tumors: a randomized controlled trial.内镜超声引导下19G细针湿肝素化抽吸对胰腺实性肿瘤的检测价值:一项随机对照试验
Gland Surg. 2023 Apr 28;12(4):442-452. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-742. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
5
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition beyond the pancreas.内镜超声引导下胰腺以外组织的获取
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 May-Jun;36(3):257-266. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0797. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
6
EUS-guided liver biopsy: the optimal technique?超声内镜引导下肝活检:最佳技术?
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Feb 23;11(2):E169-E171. doi: 10.1055/a-1984-8006. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Hepatology.内镜超声在肝脏病学中的作用。
Gut Liver. 2023 Mar 15;17(2):204-216. doi: 10.5009/gnl220071. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
8
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.内镜超声引导下脾病变组织采集:诊断试验准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 20;17(10):e0276529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276529. eCollection 2022.
9
Diagnostic and interventional EUS in hepatology: An updated review.肝病学中的诊断性和介入性超声内镜检查:最新综述
Endosc Ultrasound. 2022 Sep-Oct;11(5):355-370. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-22-00027.
10
Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy.内镜超声引导下肝活检的最新进展。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 28;28(28):3586-3594. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3586.
内镜超声引导下活检在慢性肝病中的应用:19G细针穿刺抽吸与22G细针活检针的随机对照研究
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Jan;7(1):E62-E71. doi: 10.1055/a-0655-7462. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
4
Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EUS 引导下肝活检的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Feb;89(2):238-246.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
5
Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.细针活检与细针抽吸在胰腺和腹部肿块诊断中的对比分析:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug;16(8):1314-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
6
A meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy: diagnostic yield and the value of onsite cytopathological assessment.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺与内镜超声引导下细针活检的Meta分析:诊断率及现场细胞病理学评估的价值
Endosc Int Open. 2017 May;5(5):E363-E375. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101693.
7
Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检与细针抽吸活检用于可疑胃肠道间质瘤的比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Sep;86(3):510-515. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
8
EUS-guided liver biopsy provides diagnostic samples comparable with those via the percutaneous or transjugular route.超声内镜引导下肝活检所提供的诊断样本与经皮或经颈静脉途径获取的样本相当。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb;83(2):360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.025. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
9
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy.内镜超声引导下肝活检。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2015 Apr-Jun;4(2):85-91. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.156711.
10
One hundred thirteen consecutive transgastric liver biopsies for hepatic parenchymal diseases: a single-institution study.针对肝实质疾病进行的113例连续经胃肝活检:一项单机构研究。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Jul;39(7):968-76. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000449.