School of Optometry & Vision Sciences and Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia.
McGill Vision Research Unit, Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020 May;40(3):323-332. doi: 10.1111/opo.12680. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
Stereopsis depends on horizontally disparate retinal images but otherwise concordance between eyes. Here we investigate the effect of spherical and meridional simulated anisometropia and aniseikonia on stereopsis thresholds. The aims were to determine effects of meridian, magnitude and the relative effects of the two conditions.
Ten participants with normal binocular vision viewed McGill modified random dot stereograms through synchronised shutter glasses. Stereoacuities were determined using a four-alternative forced-choice procedure. To induce anisometropia, trial lenses of varying power and axes were placed in front of right eyes. Seventeen combinations were used: zero (no lens) and both positive and negative, 1 and 2 D powers, at 45, 90 and 180 axes; spherical lenses were also tested. To induce aniseikonia 17 magnification power and axis combinations were used. This included zero (no lens), and 3%, 6%, 9% and 12% at axes 45, 90 and 180; overall magnifications were also tested.
For induced anisometropia, stereopsis loss increased as cylindrical axis rotated from 180° to 90°, at which the loss was similar to that for spherical blur. For example, for 2 D meridional anisometropia threshold increased from 1.53 log sec arc (i.e. 34 sec arc) for x 180 to 1.89 log sec arc (78 sec arc) for x 90. Anisometropia induced with either positive or negative lenses had similar detrimental effects on stereopsis. Unlike anisometropia, the stereopsis loss with induced meridional aniseikonia was not affected by axis and was about 64% of that for overall aniseikonia of the same amount. Approximately, each 1 D of induced anisometropia had the same effect on threshold as did each 6% of induced aniseikonia.
The axes of meridional anisometropia but not aniseikonia affected stereopsis. This suggests differences in the way that monocular blur (anisometropia) and interocular shape differences (aniseikonia) are processed during the production of stereopsis.
立体视依赖于水平方向上的视网膜差异图像,但双眼之间存在一致性。在这里,我们研究了球镜和子午线模拟的屈光参差和不等像对立体视敏度阈值的影响。目的是确定子午线、幅度的影响以及两种情况的相对影响。
10 名具有正常双眼视力的参与者通过同步快门眼镜观察 McGill 改良随机点立体图。使用四选一强制选择程序确定立体视锐度。为了引起屈光参差,在右眼前面放置了不同功率和轴的试镜。使用了 17 种组合:零(无镜片)和正、负 1 和 2 D 功率,45、90 和 180 轴;还测试了球镜。为了引起不等像,使用了 17 种放大倍率和轴的组合。这包括零(无镜片),以及 3%、6%、9%和 12%,在 45、90 和 180 轴;还测试了整体放大率。
对于诱导的屈光参差,随着圆柱轴从 180°旋转到 90°,立体视锐度损失增加,此时损失与球镜模糊相似。例如,对于 2 D 子午线屈光参差,阈值从 x 180 的 1.53 log sec arc(即 34 sec arc)增加到 x 90 的 1.89 log sec arc(78 sec arc)。正、负透镜引起的屈光参差对立体视锐度有相似的不利影响。与屈光参差不同,诱导的子午线不等像引起的立体视锐度损失不受轴的影响,约为相同量的整体不等像的 64%。大约,每 1 D 的诱导屈光参差对阈值的影响与每 6%的诱导不等像相同。
子午线屈光参差的轴而不是不等像影响立体视。这表明在产生立体视的过程中,单眼模糊(屈光参差)和双眼形状差异(不等像)的处理方式不同。