• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利妥昔单抗在复发性缓解型多发性硬化症成人患者中的应用:一项系统性文献回顾。

Use of rituximab in adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic literature review.

机构信息

Parexel International, Mohali, India.

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 May;36(5):809-826. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1739009. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1080/03007995.2020.1739009
PMID:32129684
Abstract

Rituximab is used as an off-label treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS); however, the comparative efficacy and safety of rituximab versus currently licensed disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) for RRMS is unknown. A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the available data pertaining to efficacy and safety of rituximab in adult patients with RRMS and highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (HA-RMS); data quality was critically assessed via risk of bias (RoB) assessment. Biomedical literature databases were searched until mid-2018 and key proceedings were searched from 2016 to 2018. Critical appraisal of non-randomized studies was conducted using the Cochrane RoB assessment tool; randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were appraised using comprehensive assessment criteria based on the NICE guidelines. Thirty-eight unique studies based on 49 publications were identified: 25 RRMS studies (one RCT) and 13 HA-RMS studies (no RCTs). The evidence among patients with RRMS generally favored rituximab in comparison to placebo (relapse rate) and interferons/glatiramer acetate (relapse rate and disability progression), although much of the non-randomized data were descriptive and/or not statistically significant. In comparison to placebo, rituximab was associated with a greater risk of adverse events. Two-thirds of the non-randomized RRMS studies were associated with critical/serious RoB; the single RCT was associated with low RoB. Furthermore, all of the non-randomized HA-RMS studies were associated with critical/serious RoB. Available evidence of off-label rituximab use for the treatment of patients with RRMS suggests generally favorable efficacy versus placebo and interferons/glatiramer acetate; however, the poor quality of the included studies limits any robust conclusions.

摘要

利妥昔单抗被用作复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)的标签外治疗;然而,利妥昔单抗与目前批准的疾病修正治疗药物(DMDs)在 RRMS 中的疗效和安全性比较尚不清楚。进行了系统的文献回顾,以评估利妥昔单抗在 RRMS 和高度活跃性复发多发性硬化症(HA-RMS)成年患者中的疗效和安全性的现有数据;通过风险偏倚(RoB)评估对数据质量进行了严格评估。直到 2018 年年中,对生物医学文献数据库进行了搜索,并对 2016 年至 2018 年的主要会议进行了搜索。使用 Cochrane RoB 评估工具对非随机研究进行了批判性评估;根据 NICE 指南的综合评估标准对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了评估。基于 49 篇出版物,确定了 38 项独特的研究:25 项 RRMS 研究(1 项 RCT)和 13 项 HA-RMS 研究(无 RCT)。RRMS 患者的证据通常倾向于利妥昔单抗与安慰剂(复发率)和干扰素/那他珠单抗(复发率和残疾进展)相比,尽管大部分非随机数据是描述性的,或者没有统计学意义。与安慰剂相比,利妥昔单抗与不良反应风险增加相关。三分之二的非随机 RRMS 研究与关键/严重 RoB 相关;唯一的 RCT 与低 RoB 相关。此外,所有非随机的 HA-RMS 研究均与关键/严重 RoB 相关。关于利妥昔单抗标签外治疗 RRMS 患者的可用证据表明,与安慰剂和干扰素/那他珠单抗相比,其疗效通常较好;然而,纳入研究的质量较差限制了任何稳健的结论。

相似文献

1
Use of rituximab in adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic literature review.利妥昔单抗在复发性缓解型多发性硬化症成人患者中的应用:一项系统性文献回顾。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 May;36(5):809-826. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1739009. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
2
Rituximab for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.利妥昔单抗用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 6;2013(12):CD009130. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009130.pub3.
3
Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.干扰素β与醋酸格拉替雷治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 24;11(11):CD009333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009333.pub3.
4
Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.β-干扰素与醋酸格拉替雷治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 26(7):CD009333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009333.pub2.
5
Natalizumab for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.那他珠单抗用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD007621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007621.pub2.
6
Teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis.特立氟胺用于治疗多发性硬化症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD009882. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009882.pub2.
7
Spotlight on glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.聚焦醋酸格拉替雷在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中的应用
BioDrugs. 2003;17(3):207-10. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200317030-00007.
8
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of beta-interferon and glatiramer acetate for treating multiple sclerosis: systematic review and economic evaluation.β干扰素和醋酸格拉替雷治疗多发性硬化症的临床疗效和成本效益:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Sep;21(52):1-352. doi: 10.3310/hta21520.
9
Glatiramer acetate: a review of its use in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.醋酸格拉替雷:复发缓解型多发性硬化症治疗应用综述
CNS Drugs. 2002;16(12):825-50. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200216120-00004.
10
Efficacy and safety of rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.利妥昔单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neuroimmunol. 2020 Oct 15;347:577317. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2020.577317. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
What Have Failed, Interrupted, and Withdrawn Antibody Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis Taught Us?失败、中断和撤回的多发性硬化症抗体疗法给我们带来了什么启示?
Neurotherapeutics. 2022 Apr;19(3):785-807. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01246-3. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
2
Comparison of Dimethyl Fumarate vs Fingolimod and Rituximab vs Natalizumab for Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis.二甲基富马酸与芬戈莫德和利妥昔单抗与那他珠单抗治疗多发性硬化症的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2134627. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34627.
3
Rituximab for people with multiple sclerosis.
利妥昔单抗治疗多发性硬化症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 8;11(11):CD013874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013874.pub2.