Parexel International, Mohali, India.
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 May;36(5):809-826. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1739009. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
Rituximab is used as an off-label treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS); however, the comparative efficacy and safety of rituximab versus currently licensed disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) for RRMS is unknown. A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the available data pertaining to efficacy and safety of rituximab in adult patients with RRMS and highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (HA-RMS); data quality was critically assessed via risk of bias (RoB) assessment. Biomedical literature databases were searched until mid-2018 and key proceedings were searched from 2016 to 2018. Critical appraisal of non-randomized studies was conducted using the Cochrane RoB assessment tool; randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were appraised using comprehensive assessment criteria based on the NICE guidelines. Thirty-eight unique studies based on 49 publications were identified: 25 RRMS studies (one RCT) and 13 HA-RMS studies (no RCTs). The evidence among patients with RRMS generally favored rituximab in comparison to placebo (relapse rate) and interferons/glatiramer acetate (relapse rate and disability progression), although much of the non-randomized data were descriptive and/or not statistically significant. In comparison to placebo, rituximab was associated with a greater risk of adverse events. Two-thirds of the non-randomized RRMS studies were associated with critical/serious RoB; the single RCT was associated with low RoB. Furthermore, all of the non-randomized HA-RMS studies were associated with critical/serious RoB. Available evidence of off-label rituximab use for the treatment of patients with RRMS suggests generally favorable efficacy versus placebo and interferons/glatiramer acetate; however, the poor quality of the included studies limits any robust conclusions.
利妥昔单抗被用作复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)的标签外治疗;然而,利妥昔单抗与目前批准的疾病修正治疗药物(DMDs)在 RRMS 中的疗效和安全性比较尚不清楚。进行了系统的文献回顾,以评估利妥昔单抗在 RRMS 和高度活跃性复发多发性硬化症(HA-RMS)成年患者中的疗效和安全性的现有数据;通过风险偏倚(RoB)评估对数据质量进行了严格评估。直到 2018 年年中,对生物医学文献数据库进行了搜索,并对 2016 年至 2018 年的主要会议进行了搜索。使用 Cochrane RoB 评估工具对非随机研究进行了批判性评估;根据 NICE 指南的综合评估标准对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了评估。基于 49 篇出版物,确定了 38 项独特的研究:25 项 RRMS 研究(1 项 RCT)和 13 项 HA-RMS 研究(无 RCT)。RRMS 患者的证据通常倾向于利妥昔单抗与安慰剂(复发率)和干扰素/那他珠单抗(复发率和残疾进展)相比,尽管大部分非随机数据是描述性的,或者没有统计学意义。与安慰剂相比,利妥昔单抗与不良反应风险增加相关。三分之二的非随机 RRMS 研究与关键/严重 RoB 相关;唯一的 RCT 与低 RoB 相关。此外,所有非随机的 HA-RMS 研究均与关键/严重 RoB 相关。关于利妥昔单抗标签外治疗 RRMS 患者的可用证据表明,与安慰剂和干扰素/那他珠单抗相比,其疗效通常较好;然而,纳入研究的质量较差限制了任何稳健的结论。