Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Sarcoma Unit, Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Cancer. 2020 Jun 1;126(11):2637-2647. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32795. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
The optimal treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma is still debated. Given histotype-specific prospective controlled data lacking, this study retrospectively evaluated doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, and doxorubicin alone as first-line treatments for advanced/metastatic leiomyosarcoma treated at European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (EORTC-STBSG) sites.
The inclusion criteria were a confirmed histological diagnosis, treatment between January 2010 and December 2015, measurable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, and an age ≥ 18 years. The endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR). PFS was analyzed with methods for interval-censored data. Patients were matched according to their propensity scores, which were estimated with a logistic regression model accounting for histology, grade, age, sex, performance status, tumor site, and tumor extent.
Three hundred three patients from 18 EORTC-STBSG sites were identified. One hundred seventeen (39%) received doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, 71 (23%) received doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, and 115 (38%) received doxorubicin. In the 2:1:2 propensity score-matched population (205 patients), the estimated median PFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-9.7 months), 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.2-10.1 months), and 4.8 months (95% CI, 2.3-6.0 months) with ORRs of 30.9%, 19.5%, and 25.6% for doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, and doxorubicin alone, respectively. PFS was significantly longer with doxorubicin plus dacarbazine versus doxorubicin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99). Doxorubicin plus dacarbazine was associated with longer OS (median, 36.8 months; 95% CI, 27.9-47.2 months) in comparison with both doxorubicin plus ifosfamide (median, 21.9 months; 95% CI, 16.7-33.4 months; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.40-1.06) and doxorubicin (median, 30.3 months; 95% CI, 21.0-36.3 months; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43-0.99). Adjusted analyses retained an effect for PFS but not for OS. None of the factors selected for multivariate analysis had a significant interaction with the received treatment for both PFS and OS.
This is the largest retrospective study of first-line treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma. In the propensity score-matched population, doxorubicin and dacarbazine showed favorable activity in terms of both ORR and PFS and warrants further evaluation in prospective trials.
晚期平滑肌肉瘤的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。鉴于缺乏特定组织学的前瞻性对照研究数据,本研究回顾性评估了多柔比星联合达卡巴嗪、多柔比星联合异环磷酰胺和多柔比星作为欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织肉瘤研究组(EORTC-STBSG)治疗的晚期/转移性平滑肌肉瘤的一线治疗药物。
纳入标准为组织学确诊、2010 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月间接受治疗、可测量疾病(实体瘤反应评估标准 1.1)、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分≤2 且年龄≥18 岁。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和总缓解率(ORR)。使用适用于区间删失数据的方法分析 PFS。根据他们的倾向评分进行匹配,倾向评分通过考虑组织学、分级、年龄、性别、体能状态、肿瘤部位和肿瘤范围的逻辑回归模型进行估计。
从 18 个 EORTC-STBSG 站点中确定了 303 名患者。117 名(39%)患者接受了多柔比星联合达卡巴嗪、71 名(23%)患者接受了多柔比星联合异环磷酰胺,115 名(38%)患者接受了多柔比星。在 2:1:2 的倾向评分匹配人群(205 名患者)中,估计的中位 PFS 分别为 9.2 个月(95%置信区间 [CI],5.2-9.7 个月)、8.2 个月(95%CI,5.2-10.1 个月)和 4.8 个月(95%CI,2.3-6.0 个月),ORR 分别为 30.9%、19.5%和 25.6%,用于多柔比星联合达卡巴嗪、多柔比星联合异环磷酰胺和多柔比星。与多柔比星相比,多柔比星联合达卡巴嗪的 PFS 显著延长(风险比 [HR],0.72;95%CI,0.52-0.99)。与多柔比星联合异环磷酰胺(中位 OS,21.9 个月;95%CI,16.7-33.4 个月;HR,0.65;95%CI,0.40-1.06)和多柔比星(中位 OS,30.3 个月;95%CI,21.0-36.3 个月;HR,0.66;95%CI,0.43-0.99)相比,多柔比星联合达卡巴嗪与 OS 相关。调整后的分析保留了对 PFS 的影响,但对 OS 没有影响。多变量分析中选择的因素均未对 PFS 和 OS 产生显著的交互作用。
这是对晚期平滑肌肉瘤一线治疗的最大回顾性研究。在倾向评分匹配人群中,多柔比星联合达卡巴嗪在 ORR 和 PFS 方面均具有良好的疗效,值得在前瞻性试验中进一步评估。