Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) Hospital, PUMC and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100730, China.
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Haidian, Beijing, 100142, China.
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1138-1147. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07478-8. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
Caudate lobectomy via laparoscopic surgery has rarely been described. This multicenter, propensity score-matched study was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic caudate lobectomy (LCL).
A multicenter retrospective study was performed including all patients who underwent LCL and open caudate lobectomy (OCL) in four institutions from January 2013 to December 2018. In total, 131 patients were included in this study and divided into LCL (n = 19) and OCL (n = 112) groups. LCLs were matched to OCLs (1:2) using a propensity score matching (PSM) based on nine preoperative variables, including patient demographics and tumor characteristics. The pathological results, perioperative and postoperative parameters, and short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.
After PSM, there were 18 and 36 patients in the LCL and OCL groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics were comparable after matching. LCL was associated with less blood (100 vs. 300 ml, respectively; P < 0.001) and a shorter postoperative stay (6.0 vs 8.0 days, respectively; P = 0.003). Most patients' resection margins were > 10 mm in the LCL group (P = 0.021), and all patients with malignancy in both groups achieved R0 resection. In terms of early postoperative outcomes, the overall morbidity rate was identical in each group (11.1% vs. 11.1%, respectively; P = 1.000). No mortality occurred in either group.
Laparoscopy is a feasible choice for resection of tumors located in the caudate lobe with acceptable perioperative results.
腹腔镜下尾状叶切除术很少见。本多中心倾向评分匹配研究旨在评估腹腔镜尾状叶切除术(LCL)的安全性和有效性。
本研究为多中心回顾性研究,纳入 2013 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间 4 家机构行 LCL 和开腹尾状叶切除术(OCL)的所有患者。共纳入 131 例患者,分为 LCL 组(n=19)和 OCL 组(n=112)。采用基于 9 项术前变量(包括患者人口统计学和肿瘤特征)的倾向评分匹配(PSM)将 LCL 与 OCL 匹配。比较两组的病理结果、围手术期和术后参数以及短期结果。
PSM 后,LCL 组和 OCL 组分别有 18 例和 36 例患者。匹配后基线特征具有可比性。LCL 组术中出血量更少(分别为 100ml 和 300ml;P<0.001),术后住院时间更短(分别为 6.0d 和 8.0d;P=0.003)。LCL 组大部分患者的切缘>10mm(P=0.021),两组所有恶性肿瘤患者均达到 R0 切除。在早期术后结果方面,两组的总并发症发生率相同(分别为 11.1%和 11.1%;P=1.000)。两组均无死亡病例。
腹腔镜是治疗尾状叶肿瘤的一种可行选择,具有可接受的围手术期结果。