Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
BMC Med. 2020 Mar 5;18(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-1506-3.
It is unknown whether interventions known to improve the healthcare response to domestic violence and abuse (DVA)-a global health concern-are effective outside of a trial.
An observational interrupted time series study in general practice. All registered women aged 16 and above were eligible for inclusion. In four implementation boroughs' general practices, there was face-to-face, practice-based, clinically relevant DVA training, a prompt in the electronic medical record, reminding clinicians to consider DVA, a simple referral pathway to a named advocate, ensuring direct access for women to specialist services, overseen by a national, health-focused DVA organisation, fostering best practice. The fifth comparator borough had only a session delivered by a local DVA specialist agency at community venues conveying information to clinicians. The primary outcome was the daily number of referrals received by DVA workers per 1000 women registered in a general practice, from 205 general practices, in all five northeast London boroughs. The secondary outcome was recorded new DVA cases in the electronic medical record in two boroughs. Data was analysed using an interrupted time series with a mixed effects Poisson regression model.
In the 144 general practices in the four implementation boroughs, there was a significant increase in referrals received by DVA workers-global incidence rate ratio of 30.24 (95% CI 20.55 to 44.77, p < 0.001). There was no increase in the 61 general practices in the other comparator borough (incidence rate ratio of 0.95, 95% CI 0.13 to 6.84, p = 0.959). New DVA cases recorded significantly increased with an incident rate ratio of 1.27 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.48, p < 0.002) in the implementation borough but not in the comparator borough (incidence rate ratio of 1.05, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.34, p = 0.699).
Implementing integrated referral routes, training and system-level support, guided by a national health-focused DVA organisation, outside of a trial setting, was effective and sustainable at scale, over four years (2012 to 2017) increasing referrals to DVA workers and new DVA cases recorded in electronic medical records.
目前尚不清楚在试验之外,那些已知能够改善对家庭暴力和虐待(DVA)的医疗应对的干预措施——这是一个全球性的健康问题——是否有效。
这是一项在普通诊所进行的观察性中断时间序列研究。所有 16 岁及以上的注册女性都有资格入选。在四个实施行政区的普通诊所中,提供了面对面、基于实践、具有临床相关性的 DVA 培训、电子病历中的提示,提醒临床医生考虑 DVA、到指定倡导人的简单转诊途径,确保女性可以直接获得专家服务,由一个专注于健康的国家 DVA 组织进行监督,促进最佳实践。第五个对照行政区仅在社区场所由当地的 DVA 专家机构提供一次会议,向临床医生传达信息。主要结果是在五个伦敦东北部行政区的 205 家普通诊所中,每 1000 名注册女性中接受 DVA 工作人员转诊的每日人数。次要结果是在两个行政区的电子病历中记录新的 DVA 病例。使用中断时间序列和混合效应泊松回归模型对数据进行分析。
在四个实施行政区的 144 家普通诊所中,DVA 工作人员收到的转诊人数显著增加——全球发病率比为 30.24(95%CI 20.55 至 44.77,p<0.001)。在其他比较行政区的 61 家普通诊所中,没有增加(发病率比为 0.95,95%CI 0.13 至 6.84,p=0.959)。在实施行政区,记录的新 DVA 病例显著增加,发病率比为 1.27(95%CI 1.09 至 1.48,p<0.002),而在比较行政区则没有增加(发病率比为 1.05,95%CI 0.82 至 1.34,p=0.699)。
在试验环境之外,由一个专注于健康的国家 DVA 组织指导,实施综合转诊途径、培训和系统层面的支持,在四年(2012 年至 2017 年)期间是有效和可持续的,增加了 DVA 工作人员的转诊人数,并在电子病历中记录了新的 DVA 病例。