• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[盐酸羟考酮用于普外科手术后患者自控静脉镇痛的疗效]

[Efficacy of Oxycodone Hydrochloride for Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia after General Surgery].

作者信息

Wang Wei Jia, Ren Li Ying, Gong Ya Hong, Huang Yu Guang

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, CAMS and PUMC,Beijing 100730,China.

Operating Room,PUMC Hospital,CAMS and PUMC,Beijing 100730,China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2020 Feb 28;42(1):91-95. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.11141.

DOI:10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.11141
PMID:32131946
Abstract

To evaluate the value of oxycodone hydrochloride for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA). The medical records on postoperative pain management in our department from January 1 to June 30,2018,were retrospectively analyzed.Totally 136 patients were assigned into oxycodone,sufentanil,or morphine groups according to the opioid used in the PCIA.Patients were assessed for postoperative pain severity(scored with NRS)and adverse reactions 24,36,and 48 hours after surgery.The area under curve(AUC)was calculated. The score of pain at exercise was significantly lower in the oxycodone group(2.2±2.4)than in the sufentanil group(3.4±2.1)(=0.305,=0.0126)or the morphine group(3.4±1.7)(=0.104,=0.0277)36 hours after surgery.AUC at rest was significantly lower in the oxycodone and morphine groups than in the sufentanil group(29.00,27.00,and 40.01,respectively);in contrast,AUC at exercise was significantly lower in the oxycodone group(63.17)than in the sufentanil and morphine groups(82.00 and 80.93,respectively).The consumption of opioids was significantly higher in the sufentanil group[(37.2±16.1),(46.1±24.3),(64.4±33.4)mg]than in the oxycodone group[(20.4±14.8)(=3.571,=0.001),(24.2±16.1)(=4.63,<0.0001),(34.4±25.1)mg(=6.409,<0.0001)]or the morphine group[(16.6±11.7)(=4.233,<0.0001),(20.5±14.1)(=5.250,<0.0001),(28.8±19.0)mg(=7.354,<0.0001)]24,36,48 hours after surgery.The oxycodone group experienced less vomiting(=11.360,=0.003)and early termination of PCIA(=7.914,=0.019)compared with the other two groups. Oxycodone can be used for postoperative PCIA.It can alleviate a variety of postoperative pain,with superior analgesic efficiency and safety to sufentanil and morphine.

摘要

评估盐酸羟考酮用于患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)术后疼痛管理的价值。回顾性分析我科2018年1月1日至6月30日术后疼痛管理的病历。根据PCIA中使用的阿片类药物,将136例患者分为羟考酮组、舒芬太尼组或吗啡组。在术后24、36和48小时评估患者的术后疼痛严重程度(用NRS评分)和不良反应。计算曲线下面积(AUC)。术后36小时,羟考酮组运动时疼痛评分(2.2±2.4)显著低于舒芬太尼组(3.4±2.1)(t=0.305,P=0.0126)或吗啡组(3.4±1.7)(t=0.104,P=0.0277)。静息时AUC在羟考酮组和吗啡组显著低于舒芬太尼组(分别为29.00、27.00和40.01);相反,运动时AUC在羟考酮组(63.17)显著低于舒芬太尼组和吗啡组(分别为82.00和80.93)。术后24、36、48小时,舒芬太尼组阿片类药物消耗量[(37.2±16.1)、(46.1±24.3)、(64.4±33.4)mg]显著高于羟考酮组[(20.4±14.8)mg(t=3.571,P=0.001)、(24.2±16.1)mg(t=4.63,P<0.0001)、(34.4±25.1)mg(t=6.409,P<0.0001)]或吗啡组[(16.6±11.7)mg(t=4.233,P<0.0001)、(20.5±14.1)mg(t=5.250,P<0.0001)、(28.8±19.0)mg(t=7.354,P<0.0001)]。与其他两组相比,羟考酮组呕吐发生率较低(χ²=11.360,P=0.003)且PCIA提前终止率较低(χ²=7.914,P=0.019)。羟考酮可用于术后PCIA。它能缓解多种术后疼痛,镇痛效果和安全性优于舒芬太尼和吗啡。

相似文献

1
[Efficacy of Oxycodone Hydrochloride for Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia after General Surgery].[盐酸羟考酮用于普外科手术后患者自控静脉镇痛的疗效]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2020 Feb 28;42(1):91-95. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.11141.
2
Oxycodone versus sufentanil in adult patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after abdominal surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multiple-center clinical trial.腹部手术后成人患者自控静脉镇痛中羟考酮与舒芬太尼的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、多中心临床试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(31):e11552. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011552.
3
Effect of oxycodone combined with ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block on postoperative analgesia in patients with lung cancer undergoing thoracoscopic surgery: protocol for a randomised controlled study.羟考酮联合超声引导胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腔镜肺癌术后患者镇痛效果的随机对照研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 16;13(10):e074416. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074416.
4
Effect of preoperative intravenous oxycodone on sufentanil consumption after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.术前静脉注射羟考酮对腹腔镜根治性胃切除术后舒芬太尼用量的影响。
J Opioid Manag. 2016 May-Jun;12(3):181-5. doi: 10.5055/jom.2016.0330.
5
Oxycodone vs Sufentanil in Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Gynecological Tumor Operation: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.妇科肿瘤手术后患者自控静脉镇痛中羟考酮与舒芬太尼的比较:一项随机双盲临床试验
J Pain Res. 2020 May 5;13:937-946. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S236933. eCollection 2020.
6
Effects of oxycodone applied for patient-controlled analgesia on postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled clinical trial.羟考酮用于患者自控镇痛对老年全髋关节置换术后认知功能的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Feb;32(2):329-337. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01202-w. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
7
Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia for Advanced Cancer Patients with Pain: A Retrospective Series Study.晚期癌症疼痛患者的患者自控静脉镇痛:一项回顾性系列研究
Pain Res Manag. 2018 Apr 4;2018:7323581. doi: 10.1155/2018/7323581. eCollection 2018.
8
Effect of preoperative intravenous oxycodone administration on sufentanil consumption after retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy.术前静脉注射羟考酮对腹膜后腹腔镜肾切除术后舒芬太尼用量的影响。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2016;48(5):300-304. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2016.0052. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
9
Effects of Oxycodone Combined With Flurbiprofen Axetil on Postoperative Analgesia and Immune Function in Patients Undergoing Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer.羟考酮联合氟比洛芬酯对结直肠癌根治术患者术后镇痛及免疫功能的影响
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Mar;10(3):251-259. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.818. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
10
Comparison of oxycodone and sufentanil in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for postoperative patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较羟考酮和舒芬太尼用于术后患者患者自控静脉镇痛的效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 Jan 5;136(1):45-52. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002259.