Tak Tahir, Jaekel Camilla M, Gharacholou Shahyar M, Dworak Marshall W, Marshall Scott A
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Department of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare in La Crosse, La Crosse, Wisconsin.
Int J Angiol. 2020 Mar;29(1):45-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697921. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
Doxorubicin is a standard treatment option for breast cancer, lymphoma, and leukemia, but its benefits are limited by its potential for cardiotoxicity. The primary objective of this study was to compare cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) versus echocardiography (ECHO) to detect a reduction in left ventricular ejection function, suggestive of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. We studied eligible patients who were 18 years or older, who had breast cancer or lymphoma, and who were offered treatment with doxorubicin with curative intent dosing of 240 to 300 mg/m body surface area between March 1, 2009 and October 31, 2013. Patients underwent baseline CMRI and ECHO. Both imaging studies were repeated after four cycles of treatment. Ejection fraction (EF) calculated by both methods was compared and analyzed with the inferential statistical Student's test. Twenty-eight eligible patients were enrolled. Two patients stopped participating in the study before undergoing baseline CMRI; 26 patients underwent baseline ECHO and CMRI. Eight of those 26 patients declined posttreatment studies, so the final study population was 18 patients. There was a significant difference in EF pre- and posttreatment in the CMRI group ( = 0.009) versus the ECHO group that showed no significant differences in EF ( = NS). It appears that CMRI is superior to ECHO for detecting doxorubicin-induced reductions in cardiac systolic function. However, ECHO is less expensive and more convenient for patients because of its noninvasive character and bedside practicality. A larger study is needed to confirm these findings.
阿霉素是乳腺癌、淋巴瘤和白血病的标准治疗选择,但其益处受到心脏毒性可能性的限制。本研究的主要目的是比较心脏磁共振成像(CMRI)与超声心动图(ECHO),以检测左心室射血功能的降低,这提示阿霉素心脏毒性。我们研究了年龄在18岁及以上、患有乳腺癌或淋巴瘤且在2009年3月1日至2013年10月31日期间接受阿霉素治疗且预期治愈剂量为240至300mg/m体表面积的符合条件的患者。患者接受了基线CMRI和ECHO检查。在四个治疗周期后重复进行这两项影像学检查。采用推断性统计学学生t检验对两种方法计算的射血分数(EF)进行比较和分析。共有28名符合条件的患者入组。两名患者在接受基线CMRI检查前停止参与研究;26名患者接受了基线ECHO和CMRI检查。这26名患者中有8名拒绝接受治疗后检查,因此最终研究人群为18名患者。CMRI组治疗前后的EF有显著差异(P = 0.009),而ECHO组的EF无显著差异(P = 无显著性)。似乎CMRI在检测阿霉素引起的心脏收缩功能降低方面优于ECHO。然而,由于ECHO具有非侵入性特点和床边实用性,对患者来说成本更低且更方便。需要进行更大规模的研究来证实这些发现。