• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

处女膜检查:在欧洲和北美地区的初级保健医生的建议。

Virginity testing: recommendations for primary care physicians in Europe and North America.

机构信息

Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jan 20;5(1):e002057. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002057. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002057
PMID:32133175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7042604/
Abstract

Virginity testing is a complex, culturally mediated practice that is poorly understood by Western clinicians. While advocating for global elimination of the practice of virginity testing as a human rights violation, clinical practice is often more complicated and ethically nuanced, and the clinician must act in the best interest of her patient. Upholding human rights does not have to be incompatible with providing a needed service to a patient, which should never include an invasive exam if not medically necessary, but should include education and safety assessments.

摘要

处女膜检查是一种复杂的、受文化影响的做法,西方临床医生对此了解甚少。虽然倡导全球消除处女膜检查这种侵犯人权的行为,但临床实践往往更加复杂,伦理上也更加微妙,临床医生必须为患者的最佳利益行事。维护人权不一定与向患者提供必要服务相冲突,如果处女膜检查不是医学上必需的,就绝不应包括侵入性检查,而应包括教育和安全评估。

相似文献

1
Virginity testing: recommendations for primary care physicians in Europe and North America.处女膜检查:在欧洲和北美地区的初级保健医生的建议。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jan 20;5(1):e002057. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002057. eCollection 2020.
2
Virginity Testing.处女膜检查。
J Forensic Nurs. 2022;18(4):E38-E40. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000404. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
3
[Virginity testing and hymen examination].[处女膜检查与贞操测试]
Rev Med Liege. 2020 Oct;75(10):670-675.
4
Why physicians ought not to perform virginity tests.医生为何不应进行处女膜检查。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Aug;41(8):691-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102344. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
5
Questioned Virginity Has No Definite Reply.质疑童贞并无明确答案。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 May;51(4):2369-2372. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02332-5. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
6
Virginity Testing Beyond a Medical Examination.超越医学检查的处女膜检查
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Nov 18;8(7):152-64. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n7p152.
7
Promoting women's human rights: A qualitative analysis of midwives' perceptions about virginity control and hymen 'reconstruction'.促进妇女人权:对助产士关于处女膜修复和处女贞操观念的定性分析
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2015 Jun;20(3):181-92. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2014.977435. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
8
Virginity examinations in Turkey: role of forensic physicians in controlling female sexuality.土耳其的处女膜检查:法医在控制女性性行为方面的作用。
JAMA. 1999 Aug 4;282(5):485-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.5.485.
9
Wrestling with the hymen: knowledge and attitudes.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2014 Aug;19(4):238-43. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2014.911272. Epub 2014 May 23.
10
Virginity testing in South Africa: re-traditioning the postcolony.南非的处女膜检测:后殖民地的重新传统化
Cult Health Sex. 2006 Jan-Feb;8(1):17-30. doi: 10.1080/13691050500404225.

引用本文的文献

1
Reproductive health challenges of an African school girl: a case report on non-bulging imperforate hymen with haematocolpometra during Covid-19 pandemic.非洲女学生的生殖健康挑战:Covid-19 大流行期间非膨出闭锁处女膜伴阴道积血的病例报告。
Afr Health Sci. 2023 Sep;23(3):128-131. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i3.16.
2
Complications of hymenoplasty.处女膜修补术的并发症。
BMJ Case Rep. 2023 Oct 5;16(10):e251008. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2022-251008.
3
Questioned Virginity Has No Definite Reply.质疑童贞并无明确答案。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 May;51(4):2369-2372. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02332-5. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
4
The role of religion in mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic: the Malaysian multi-faith perspectives.宗教在减轻 COVID-19 大流行中的作用:马来西亚多元信仰视角。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Feb 17;37(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab041.

本文引用的文献

1
The little tissue that couldn't - dispelling myths about the Hymen's role in determining sexual history and assault.小组织的大作用——破除关于处女膜在决定性史和性侵犯中的作用的误区。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 3;16(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0731-8.
2
A survey of honor-related practices among US obstetricians and gynecologists.一项关于美国妇产科医生中与荣誉相关行为的调查。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Nov;139(2):164-169. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12294. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
3
Virginity testing: a systematic review.处女膜完整性检测:一项系统综述
Reprod Health. 2017 May 18;14(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0319-0.
4
Virginity Testing Beyond a Medical Examination.超越医学检查的处女膜检查
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Nov 18;8(7):152-64. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n7p152.
5
Virginity testing in professional obstetric and gynaecological ethics.专业妇产科伦理中的处女膜检测
Lancet. 2016 Jul 2;388(10039):98-100. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01275-1. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
6
Statement on virginity testing.关于处女膜检查的声明。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2015 Jul;33:121-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
7
Why physicians ought not to perform virginity tests.医生为何不应进行处女膜检查。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Aug;41(8):691-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102344. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
8
Restoration of virginity: women's demand and health care providers' response in Switzerland.修复处女膜:瑞士女性的需求与医疗保健提供者的回应
J Sex Med. 2013 Sep;10(9):2334-42. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12231. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
9
The experience and responses of Swedish health professionals to patients requesting virginity restoration (hymen repair).瑞典医疗专业人员对要求处女膜修复的患者的经验与反应。
Reprod Health Matters. 2010 May;18(35):38-46. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(10)35498-X.
10
Reports of repetitive penile-genital penetration often have no definitive evidence of penetration.报告中提到的重复性阴茎-生殖器接触通常没有明确的穿透证据。
Pediatrics. 2009 Sep;124(3):e403-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3053. Epub 2009 Aug 3.