Susairaj Priscilla, Snehalatha Chamukuttan, Raghavan Arun, Nanditha Arun, Vinitha Ramachandran, Satheesh Krishnamoorthy, Johnston Desmond G, Wareham Nicholas J, Ramachandran Ambady
India Diabetes Research Foundation and Dr. A. Ramachandran's Diabetes Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
J Diabetes Clin Res. 2019;1(2):53-58. doi: 10.33696/diabetes.1.009.
The increased morbidity and mortality due to type 2 diabetes can be partly due to its delayed diagnosis. In developing countries, the cost and unavailability of conventional screening methods can be a setback. Use of random blood glucose (RBG) may be beneficial in testing large numbers at a low cost and in a short time in identifying persons at risk of developing diabetes. In this analysis, we aim to derive the values of RBG corresponding to the cut-off values of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) used to define prediabetes and diabetes.
Based on their risk profile of developing diabetes, a total of 2835 individuals were screened for a large diabetes prevention study. They were subjected to HbA1c testing to diagnose prediabetes and diabetes. Random capillary blood glucose was also performed. Correlation of RBG with HbA1c was computed using multiple linear regression equation. The optimal cut-off value for RBG corresponding to HbA1c value of 5.7% (39 mmol/mol), and ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) were computed using the receiver operating curve (ROC). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed from the area under the curve (AUC) and by using the Youden's index.
RBG showed significant correlation with HbA1c (r=0.40, p<0.0001). Using the ROC analysis, a RBG cut-off value of 140.5 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/L) corresponding to an HbA1c value of 6.5% (48mmol/mol) was derived. A cut-off value could not be derived for HbA1c of 5.7% (39 mmol/mol) since the specificity and sensitivity for identifying prediabetes were low.
Use of a capillary RBG value was found to be a simple procedure. The derived RBG cut-off value will aid in identifying people with undiagnosed diabetes. This preliminary screening will reduce the number to undergo more cumbersome and invasive diagnostic testing.
2型糖尿病所致发病率和死亡率增加部分原因可能是其诊断延迟。在发展中国家,传统筛查方法的成本及难以获得可能是一大障碍。使用随机血糖(RBG)以低成本、短时间检测大量人群,对于识别有患糖尿病风险的人可能有益。在本分析中,我们旨在得出与用于定义糖尿病前期和糖尿病的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)临界值相对应的RBG值。
基于患糖尿病的风险状况,对2835名个体进行筛查以开展一项大型糖尿病预防研究。对他们进行HbA1c检测以诊断糖尿病前期和糖尿病。同时也检测随机毛细血管血糖。使用多元线性回归方程计算RBG与HbA1c的相关性。使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)计算与HbA1c值5.7%(39 mmol/mol)及≥6.5%(48 mmol/mol)相对应的RBG最佳临界值。通过曲线下面积(AUC)并使用约登指数评估诊断准确性。
RBG与HbA1c显示出显著相关性(r = 0.40,p < 0.0001)。使用ROC分析,得出与HbA1c值6.5%(48 mmol/mol)相对应的RBG临界值为140.5 mg/dl(7.8 mmol/L)。由于识别糖尿病前期的特异性和敏感性较低,无法得出与HbA1c值5.7%(39 mmol/mol)相对应的临界值。
发现使用毛细血管RBG值是一个简单的程序。得出的RBG临界值将有助于识别未被诊断的糖尿病患者。这种初步筛查将减少接受更繁琐和侵入性诊断检测的人数。