Department of Psychological Sciences, University of California, Merced.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Dev Psychol. 2020 Apr;56(4):837-840. doi: 10.1037/dev0000887.
The collection of articles presented by Pollak, Camras, and Cole (2019) provides a stimulating survey of the current state of research on emotional development. However, the special issue also makes apparent the need for defining the construct of interest. Definitions of emotions guide how researchers deal with fundamental theoretical and methodological issues in emotion research. In this commentary, we contrast 2 views of emotion: the structuralist and functionalist perspectives. We illustrate the consequences of each view for the design and interpretation of empirical research and highlight benefits of adopting a functionalist perspective on emotional development. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
波拉克、卡姆拉斯和科尔(2019 年)收集的文章为当前情感发展研究的现状提供了一个令人振奋的调查。然而,这个特刊也明显表明需要定义感兴趣的结构。情绪的定义指导研究人员如何处理情绪研究中的基本理论和方法问题。在这篇评论中,我们对比了两种情绪观点:结构主义和功能主义观点。我们举例说明了每种观点对实证研究的设计和解释的影响,并强调了采用情感发展的功能主义观点的好处。(心理学文摘数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。