Department of Psychiatry.
Department of Psychology.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(4):445-457. doi: 10.1037/ort0000447. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
Historically, intensive obsessive-compulsive and related disorder (OCRD) treatment settings have been underrepresentative in terms of patient race and ethnicity. The present study piloted a novel technique to measure multiple marginalized identities and assess their impact on obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms and treatment response across intensive residential treatment (IRT). Participants included 715 residents receiving IRT for OCRD. Measures included the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale, Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS), Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-44, and measures of depression and quality of life. In addition, we piloted a marginalized identity score, an additive measure of intersectionality. Most patients endorsed holding primarily privileged identities. Higher marginalized identity score was significantly correlated with higher depression symptom severity and lower quality of life throughout treatment. Both at baseline and discharge, higher marginalized identity score was significantly and positively correlated with greater OCD symptom severity. Higher marginalized identity score was significantly associated with greater severity of DOCS1, DOCS2, DOCS4, and obsessive beliefs across multiple domains. Consistent with previous literature, patients in our IRT setting were not demographically representative of the general population. Individuals with more marginalized identities endorsed higher symptoms of OCD, obsessive beliefs, OCD dimensions, and depression, as well as lower quality of life at admission and discharge. Results support increased consideration of the role marginalization plays in symptom severity, symptom presentation, and treatment response across treatment settings. Further investigation is warranted to better address the multiplicative effects of holding intersecting marginalized identities and how treatment may be adapted to ameliorate these inequities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
从历史上看,密集型强迫症及相关障碍(OCRD)治疗环境在患者的种族和民族方面代表性不足。本研究尝试了一种新方法来衡量多种边缘化身份,并评估它们对密集型住院治疗(IRT)中强迫症(OCD)症状和治疗反应的影响。参与者包括 715 名接受 OCRD 密集型住院治疗的患者。测量包括耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表、多维强迫症量表(DOCS)、强迫信念问卷-44 以及抑郁和生活质量的测量。此外,我们还尝试了边缘化身份评分,这是一种交叉性的附加衡量标准。大多数患者主要认同特权身份。在整个治疗过程中,较高的边缘化身份评分与较高的抑郁症状严重程度和较低的生活质量显著相关。在基线和出院时,较高的边缘化身份评分与较高的 OCD 症状严重程度显著正相关。较高的边缘化身份评分与 DOCS1、DOCS2、DOCS4 以及多个领域的强迫性信念的严重程度显著相关。与之前的文献一致,我们的 IRT 环境中的患者在人口统计学上与一般人群没有代表性。身份更边缘化的个体报告的 OCD 症状、强迫观念、OCD 维度和抑郁症状更严重,入院和出院时的生活质量也更低。研究结果支持在治疗环境中更多地考虑边缘化在症状严重程度、症状表现和治疗反应中的作用。进一步的研究是必要的,以更好地解决持有交叉边缘化身份的倍增效应,以及治疗如何适应来改善这些不平等。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。