Schaechter Temma, Flowers Sasha N, Weiss Michal, Becker-Haimes Emily M, Sanchez Amanda L
Department of Education and Human Services, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s10578-025-01833-3.
Treatment inequities persist among marginalized youth who experience anxiety and trauma-related disorders. Culturally adapted interventions show potential for improving outcomes for marginalized youth. However, it is unclear the extent to which they improve engagement and can be successfully implemented in practice settings. This systematic review characterizes adaptations to anxiety treatments and their effectiveness for treatment engagement, clinical, and implementation outcomes. Twelve articles met inclusion criteria. Adaptations most frequently altered treatment procedures, language, or content, and least frequently altered treatment approach or goals based on cultural conceptualizations of mental health. Most adaptations targeted racially or ethnically minoritized youth and did not target intersectionality. Adapted treatments were overall effective in reducing anxious distress, yet rigorous study designs were lacking. Engagement outcomes for adapted treatments were inconsistent, and implementation outcomes (e.g., feasibility, acceptability, fidelity) were rarely assessed. The current literature is promising yet inconclusive about the benefits of adapted treatments over standard protocols.
在经历焦虑和创伤相关障碍的边缘化青年中,治疗不平等现象依然存在。文化适应性干预措施显示出改善边缘化青年治疗效果的潜力。然而,尚不清楚这些措施在多大程度上能提高参与度以及能否在实际环境中成功实施。本系统综述描述了焦虑治疗的适应性调整及其对治疗参与度、临床和实施结果的有效性。十二篇文章符合纳入标准。适应性调整最常改变治疗程序、语言或内容,而基于心理健康的文化概念改变治疗方法或目标的情况最少。大多数适应性调整针对的是种族或族裔少数群体青年,而非交叉性群体。适应性治疗总体上在减轻焦虑困扰方面有效,但缺乏严谨的研究设计。适应性治疗的参与度结果不一致,且很少评估实施结果(如可行性、可接受性、保真度)。目前的文献对于适应性治疗相对于标准方案的益处虽有前景但尚无定论。