• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院医师和专科住院医师在质量改进方面的成效如何?

How Successful Are Residents and Fellows at Quality Improvement?

作者信息

Eden Elizabeth L, Harrington Terence, Chen Ling-Wan, Chelluri Lakshmipathi, Higgins Linda W, Freel Jennifer A, DeKosky Allison, Bump Gregory M

出版信息

J Healthc Qual. 2020 Jul/Aug;42(4):e50-e57. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000258.

DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000258
PMID:32134809
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nationally, there is an expectation that residents and fellows participate in quality improvement (QI), preferably interprofessionally. Hospitals and educators invest time and resources in projects, but little is known about success rates or what fosters success.

PURPOSE

To understand what proportion of trainee QI projects were successful and whether there were predictors of success.

METHODS

We examined resident and fellow QI projects in an integrated healthcare system that supports diverse training programs in multiple hospitals over 2 years. All projects were reviewed to determine whether they represented actual QI. Projects determined as QI were considered completed or successful based on QI project sponsor self-report. Multiple characteristics were compared between successful and unsuccessful projects.

RESULTS

Trainees submitted 258 proposals, of which 106 (41.1%) represented actual QI. Non-QI projects predominantly represented needs assessments or retrospective data analyses. Seventy-six percent (81/106) of study sponsors completed surveys about their projects. Less than 25% of projects (59/258) represented actual QI and were successful. Project category was predictive of success, specifically those aimed at preventive care or education.

CONCLUSION

Less than a quarter of trainee QI projects represent successful QI.

IMPLICATIONS

Hospitals and training programs should identify interventions to improve trainee QI experience.

摘要

背景

在全国范围内,人们期望住院医师和研究员参与质量改进(QI),最好是跨专业参与。医院和教育工作者在项目上投入了时间和资源,但对于成功率或促成成功的因素却知之甚少。

目的

了解实习医生质量改进项目的成功比例以及是否存在成功的预测因素。

方法

我们研究了一个综合医疗系统中的住院医师和研究员质量改进项目,该系统在两年内支持多家医院的多样化培训项目。对所有项目进行审查以确定它们是否代表实际的质量改进。根据质量改进项目发起人的自我报告,被确定为质量改进的项目被视为已完成或成功。比较了成功项目和未成功项目的多个特征。

结果

实习生提交了258份提案,其中106份(41.1%)代表实际的质量改进。非质量改进项目主要是需求评估或回顾性数据分析。76%(81/106)的研究发起人完成了关于他们项目的调查。不到25%的项目(59/258)代表实际的质量改进且取得了成功。项目类别可预测成功,特别是那些针对预防保健或教育的项目。

结论

不到四分之一的实习医生质量改进项目代表成功的质量改进。

启示

医院和培训项目应确定干预措施,以改善实习医生的质量改进体验。

相似文献

1
How Successful Are Residents and Fellows at Quality Improvement?住院医师和专科住院医师在质量改进方面的成效如何?
J Healthc Qual. 2020 Jul/Aug;42(4):e50-e57. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000258.
2
Chief of Residents for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety: A Recipe for a New Role in Graduate Medical Education.质量改进与患者安全住院总医师:研究生医学教育新角色的秘诀
Mil Med. 2017 Mar;182(3):e1747-e1751. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00179.
3
Postgraduate Education in Quality Improvement Methods: Initial Results of the Fellows' Applied Quality Training (FAQT) Curriculum.质量改进方法的研究生教育:研究员应用质量培训(FAQT)课程的初步成果。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016 Jun;15(2):36-9. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000073.
4
Promoting Quality Improvement in Primary Care Through a Longitudinal, Project-Based, Interprofessional Curriculum.通过纵向、基于项目、跨专业课程促进初级保健质量改进。
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Sep 10;16:10932. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10932.
5
Practical Implications for an Effective Radiology Residency Quality Improvement Program for Milestone Assessment.里程碑评估有效放射科住院医师培训质量改进计划的实际意义。
Acad Radiol. 2017 Jan;24(1):95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.08.018. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
6
Multilevel Quality Improvement Teams: An Alternative Approach for Surgical Academic Training Programs to Meet ACGME Core Competency Milestones.多层次质量改进团队:一种满足 ACGME 核心能力里程碑的外科学术培训计划的替代方法。
J Surg Educ. 2019 May-Jun;76(3):785-794. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
7
Residents' knowledge of quality improvement: the impact of using a group project curriculum.住院医师的质量改进知识:采用小组项目课程的影响。
Postgrad Med J. 2015 Aug;91(1078):431-5. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132886. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
8
A longitudinal course pilot to improve surgical resident acquisition of quality improvement skills.一项改善外科住院医师获取质量改进技能的纵向课程试点。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 19;16(7):e0254922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254922. eCollection 2021.
9
Quality improvement education incorporated as an integral part of critical care fellows training at the Mayo Clinic.质量改进教育作为梅奥诊所重症医学专科培训学员培训的一个组成部分。
Acad Med. 2014 Oct;89(10):1362-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000398.
10
Engaging residents and fellows to improve institution-wide quality: the first six years of a novel financial incentive program.激励住院医师和专科医师以提高全院质量:一项新颖的财务激励计划的头六年。
Acad Med. 2014 Mar;89(3):460-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000159.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving inpatient hyperglycaemia in non-critically ill adults in resident wards through audit and feedback.通过审核和反馈改善住院非危重症成年人的高血糖症。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Mar 1;13(1):e002480. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002480.
2
Student High Value Care Initiative: a Longitudinal Model for Student-Led Implementation and Scholarship.学生高价值医疗保健倡议:学生主导实施和学术的纵向模型。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(6):1541-1546. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08100-y. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
3
The Evaluation of an Interprofessional QI Program: A Qualitative Study.
跨专业质量改进计划评估:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 15;19(16):10087. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610087.