• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双相情感障碍急性期和维持期药物治疗的可接受性:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验的系统评价。

Acceptability of Acute and Maintenance Pharmacotherapy of Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials.

机构信息

From the Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Mar/Apr;40(2):167-179. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001169.

DOI:10.1097/JCP.0000000000001169
PMID:32134852
Abstract

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to estimate and rank the risk for the discontinuation due to adverse events (DAEs), 7% or more weight gain (WG), and somnolence during the acute and maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder with a mood stabilizer or an antipsychotic monotherapy.

METHODS/PROCEDURES: The search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and clinicaltrials.gov from the inception to December 31, 2018, provided 32 studies in mania, 16 in bipolar depression, and 13 in maintenance. Data of DAEs, WG, and somnolence from each study were extracted. The risk for these variables of an active treatment relative to placebo was estimated with a number needed to harm (NNH) as a single study and pooled sample.

FINDINGS/RESULTS: For DAEs, pooled NNH ranged from 19 with carbamazepine to -21 with quetiapine-XR in mania, 11 with quetiapine-IR 600 mg/d to -37 with olanzapine/fluoxetine combination in bipolar depression, and 5 with lithium to -8 with asenapine in maintenance. For WG, pooled NNH ranged from 9 with olanzapine to -78 with aripiprazole in mania, 5 with olanzapine to -112 with lithium in bipolar depression, and 4 with olanzapine to 126 with asenapine in maintenance. For somnolence, pooled NNH was from 5 with carbamazepine to 23 with cariprazine in mania, 3 with quetiapine-XR 300 mg/d to 79 with lurasidone in bipolar depression, and 11 with olanzapine to -49 with aripiprazole in maintenance.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: All medications studied in bipolar disorder were relatively well tolerated during different phases of treatment; however, the risk for short- and long-term WG and somnolence varied widely among included psychotropics.

摘要

目的/背景:本研究旨在评估和排序在双相障碍的急性期和维持期治疗中,使用心境稳定剂或抗精神病药单药治疗时,因不良反应(DAE)停药、体重增加(WG)≥7%和嗜睡的风险。

方法/过程:从建库至 2018 年 12 月 31 日,对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO 和 clinicaltrials.gov 进行检索,共纳入 32 项治疗躁狂的研究、16 项治疗双相抑郁的研究和 13 项治疗维持期的研究。从每项研究中提取 DAE、WG 和嗜睡的数据。使用需要治疗的人数(NNH)作为单一研究和汇总样本,评估这些变量在活性治疗与安慰剂相比的风险。

结果/发现:对于 DAE,在躁狂症中,卡马西平的汇总 NNH 范围为 19,喹硫平 XR 为-21;在双相抑郁中,喹硫平 IR 600mg/d 的汇总 NNH 范围为 11,奥氮平/氟西汀联合治疗的汇总 NNH 范围为-37;在维持期,锂的汇总 NNH 范围为 5,阿立哌唑的汇总 NNH 范围为-8。对于 WG,在躁狂症中,奥氮平的汇总 NNH 范围为 9,阿立哌唑的汇总 NNH 范围为-78;在双相抑郁中,奥氮平的汇总 NNH 范围为 5,锂的汇总 NNH 范围为-112;在维持期,奥氮平的汇总 NNH 范围为 4,阿立哌唑的汇总 NNH 范围为 126。对于嗜睡,在躁狂症中,卡马西平的汇总 NNH 范围为 5,卡培拉嗪的汇总 NNH 范围为 23;在双相抑郁中,喹硫平 XR 300mg/d 的汇总 NNH 范围为 3,鲁拉西酮的汇总 NNH 范围为 79;在维持期,奥氮平的汇总 NNH 范围为 11,阿立哌唑的汇总 NNH 范围为-49。

结论

在双相障碍的不同治疗阶段,所有研究的药物均相对耐受良好;然而,包括精神药物在内,短期和长期 WG 和嗜睡的风险差异很大。

相似文献

1
Acceptability of Acute and Maintenance Pharmacotherapy of Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials.双相情感障碍急性期和维持期药物治疗的可接受性:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验的系统评价。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Mar/Apr;40(2):167-179. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001169.
2
A review of sensitivity and tolerability of antipsychotics in patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia: focus on somnolence.双相情感障碍或精神分裂症患者使用抗精神病药物的敏感性和耐受性综述:聚焦嗜睡
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;69(2):302-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0217.
3
Pharmacological treatment for bipolar mania: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials.双相情感障碍躁狂症的药物治疗:双盲随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;27(2):1136-1144. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01334-4. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of treatments for bipolar depression.双相情感障碍抑郁治疗的疗效和耐受性。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Sep 1;183:258-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 May 19.
5
Important clinical features of atypical antipsychotics in acute bipolar depression that inform routine clinical care: a review of pivotal studies with number needed to treat.非典型抗精神病药物在急性双相抑郁中的重要临床特征对常规临床护理的指导作用:对需治疗人数的关键研究综述
Neurosci Bull. 2015 Oct;31(5):572-88. doi: 10.1007/s12264-014-1534-0. Epub 2015 May 30.
6
Balancing benefits and harms of treatments for acute bipolar depression.权衡急性双相抑郁症治疗的利弊。
J Affect Disord. 2014 Dec;169 Suppl 1:S24-33. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(14)70006-0.
7
A rapid and systematic review and economic evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for treatment of mania associated with bipolar affective disorder.对用于治疗双相情感障碍相关躁狂症的新型药物的临床疗效及成本效益进行快速系统评价与经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 May;8(19):iii-iv, 1-187. doi: 10.3310/hta8190.
8
[Antipsychotics in bipolar disorders].[双相情感障碍中的抗精神病药物]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):417-24. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95456-5.
9
Clinical assessment of lurasidone benefit and risk in the treatment of bipolar I depression using number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed.使用需要治疗的人数、需要伤害的人数和帮助或伤害的可能性来评估鲁拉西酮治疗双相 I 型抑郁症的疗效和风险。
J Affect Disord. 2014 Feb;155:20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.040. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
10
Treatment of bipolar depression: making sensible decisions.双相抑郁的治疗:做出明智决策。
CNS Spectr. 2014 Dec;19 Suppl 1:4-11; quiz 1-3, 12. doi: 10.1017/S109285291400056X. Epub 2014 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in lithium concentrations among bipolar patients with different episodes based on real-world therapeutic monitoring data.基于真实世界治疗监测数据的不同发作期双相情感障碍患者锂浓度的性别差异
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):655. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07111-9.
2
Predicting remission after acute phase pharmacotherapy in patients with bipolar I depression: A machine learning approach with cross-trial and cross-drug replication.预测双相 I 型抑郁症患者急性期药物治疗后的缓解情况:一种跨试验和跨药物重复验证的机器学习方法
Bipolar Disord. 2025 Feb;27(1):36-46. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13506. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Antidiabetic Agents for Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials.
抗糖尿病药物治疗重度抑郁症和双相抑郁症的疗效与安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 19;13(4):1172. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041172.
4
An umbrella review of adverse effects associated with antipsychotic medications: the need for complementary study designs.抗精神病药物相关不良反应的伞式评价:需要互补的研究设计。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Dec;155:105454. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105454. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
5
Patterns, predictors, and patient-reported reasons for antidepressant discontinuation in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys.世界卫生组织世界精神卫生调查中抗抑郁药停药的模式、预测因素和患者报告的原因。
Psychol Med. 2024 Jan;54(1):67-78. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723002507. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
6
Sex-Specific Associations Between Bipolar Disorder Pharmacological Maintenance Therapies and Inpatient Rehospitalizations: A 9-Year Swedish National Registry Study.双相情感障碍药物维持治疗与住院再入院之间的性别特异性关联:一项为期9年的瑞典国家登记研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 12;11:598946. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.598946. eCollection 2020.