From the Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Mar/Apr;40(2):167-179. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001169.
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to estimate and rank the risk for the discontinuation due to adverse events (DAEs), 7% or more weight gain (WG), and somnolence during the acute and maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder with a mood stabilizer or an antipsychotic monotherapy.
METHODS/PROCEDURES: The search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and clinicaltrials.gov from the inception to December 31, 2018, provided 32 studies in mania, 16 in bipolar depression, and 13 in maintenance. Data of DAEs, WG, and somnolence from each study were extracted. The risk for these variables of an active treatment relative to placebo was estimated with a number needed to harm (NNH) as a single study and pooled sample.
FINDINGS/RESULTS: For DAEs, pooled NNH ranged from 19 with carbamazepine to -21 with quetiapine-XR in mania, 11 with quetiapine-IR 600 mg/d to -37 with olanzapine/fluoxetine combination in bipolar depression, and 5 with lithium to -8 with asenapine in maintenance. For WG, pooled NNH ranged from 9 with olanzapine to -78 with aripiprazole in mania, 5 with olanzapine to -112 with lithium in bipolar depression, and 4 with olanzapine to 126 with asenapine in maintenance. For somnolence, pooled NNH was from 5 with carbamazepine to 23 with cariprazine in mania, 3 with quetiapine-XR 300 mg/d to 79 with lurasidone in bipolar depression, and 11 with olanzapine to -49 with aripiprazole in maintenance.
IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: All medications studied in bipolar disorder were relatively well tolerated during different phases of treatment; however, the risk for short- and long-term WG and somnolence varied widely among included psychotropics.
目的/背景:本研究旨在评估和排序在双相障碍的急性期和维持期治疗中,使用心境稳定剂或抗精神病药单药治疗时,因不良反应(DAE)停药、体重增加(WG)≥7%和嗜睡的风险。
方法/过程:从建库至 2018 年 12 月 31 日,对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO 和 clinicaltrials.gov 进行检索,共纳入 32 项治疗躁狂的研究、16 项治疗双相抑郁的研究和 13 项治疗维持期的研究。从每项研究中提取 DAE、WG 和嗜睡的数据。使用需要治疗的人数(NNH)作为单一研究和汇总样本,评估这些变量在活性治疗与安慰剂相比的风险。
结果/发现:对于 DAE,在躁狂症中,卡马西平的汇总 NNH 范围为 19,喹硫平 XR 为-21;在双相抑郁中,喹硫平 IR 600mg/d 的汇总 NNH 范围为 11,奥氮平/氟西汀联合治疗的汇总 NNH 范围为-37;在维持期,锂的汇总 NNH 范围为 5,阿立哌唑的汇总 NNH 范围为-8。对于 WG,在躁狂症中,奥氮平的汇总 NNH 范围为 9,阿立哌唑的汇总 NNH 范围为-78;在双相抑郁中,奥氮平的汇总 NNH 范围为 5,锂的汇总 NNH 范围为-112;在维持期,奥氮平的汇总 NNH 范围为 4,阿立哌唑的汇总 NNH 范围为 126。对于嗜睡,在躁狂症中,卡马西平的汇总 NNH 范围为 5,卡培拉嗪的汇总 NNH 范围为 23;在双相抑郁中,喹硫平 XR 300mg/d 的汇总 NNH 范围为 3,鲁拉西酮的汇总 NNH 范围为 79;在维持期,奥氮平的汇总 NNH 范围为 11,阿立哌唑的汇总 NNH 范围为-49。
在双相障碍的不同治疗阶段,所有研究的药物均相对耐受良好;然而,包括精神药物在内,短期和长期 WG 和嗜睡的风险差异很大。