Marrero-Polanco Jean, Joyce Jeremiah B, Grant Caroline W, Croarkin Paul E, Athreya Arjun P, Bobo William V
Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Bipolar Disord. 2025 Feb;27(1):36-46. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13506. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
Interpatient variability in bipolar I depression (BP-D) symptoms challenges the ability to predict pharmacotherapeutic outcomes. A machine learning workflow was developed to predict remission after 8 weeks of pharmacotherapy (total score of ≤8 on the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]).
Supervised machine learning models were trained on data from BP-D patients treated with olanzapine (N = 168) and were externally validated on patients treated with olanzapine/fluoxetine combination (OFC; N = 131) and lamotrigine (LTG; N = 126). Top predictors were used to develop a prognosis rule informing how many symptoms should change and by how much within 4 weeks to increase the odds of achieving remission.
An AUC of 0.76 (NIR:0.59; p = 0.17) was established to predict remission in olanzapine-treated subjects. These trained models achieved AUCs of 0.70 with OFC (NIR:0.52; p < 0.03) and 0.73 with LTG (NIR:0.52; p < 0.003), demonstrating external replication of prediction performance. Week-4 changes in four MADRS symptoms (reported sadness, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, and concentration difficulties) were top predictors of remission. Across all pharmacotherapies, three or more of these symptoms needed to improve by ≥2 points at Week-4 to have a 65% chance of achieving remission at 8 weeks (OR: 3.74, 95% CI: 2.45-5.76; p < 9.3E-11).
Machine learning strategies achieved cross-trial and cross-drug replication in predicting remission after 8 weeks of pharmacotherapy for BP-D. Interpretable prognoses rules required only a limited number of depressive symptoms, providing a promising foundation for developing simple quantitative decision aids that may, in the future, serve as companions to clinical judgment at the point of care.
双相I型抑郁症(BP-D)症状的个体间差异对预测药物治疗结果的能力构成挑战。开发了一种机器学习工作流程,以预测药物治疗8周后的缓解情况(蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁量表[MADRS]总分≤8)。
监督机器学习模型在接受奥氮平治疗的BP-D患者数据(N = 168)上进行训练,并在接受奥氮平/氟西汀联合治疗(OFC;N = 131)和拉莫三嗪(LTG;N = 126)的患者上进行外部验证。使用顶级预测因子制定预后规则,告知在4周内应改变多少症状以及改变程度,以增加实现缓解的几率。
在接受奥氮平治疗的受试者中,预测缓解的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.76(无信息率:0.59;p = 0.17)。这些经过训练的模型在OFC组中AUC为0.70(无信息率:0.52;p < 0.03),在LTG组中AUC为0.73(无信息率:0.52;p < 0.003),证明了预测性能的外部重现性。MADRS的四个症状(报告的悲伤、睡眠减少、食欲减退和注意力不集中)在第4周的变化是缓解的顶级预测因子。在所有药物治疗中,这些症状中的三个或更多在第4周需要改善≥2分,才有65%的机会在8周时实现缓解(比值比:3.74,95%置信区间:2.45 - 5.76;p < 9.3E - 11)。
机器学习策略在预测BP-D药物治疗8周后的缓解情况方面实现了跨试验和跨药物的重现性。可解释的预后规则仅需要有限数量的抑郁症状,为开发简单的定量决策辅助工具提供了有前景的基础,这些工具未来可能在护理点作为临床判断的辅助手段。