BMT & Cellular Therapy Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Division of Biostatistics, Institute of Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jul;26(7):1288-1297. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.02.020. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
Many patients with multiple myeloma (MM) eventually relapse even after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for curative intent. Over the past decade, outcomes for patients with MM have improved significantly with the availability of new therapies, including next-generation proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and, more recently, monoclonal antibodies. Although several published studies have evaluated the outcomes of alloHCT for MM, the data on survival outcomes in patients with MM experiencing disease relapse following alloHCT are limited. In addition, the predictors for postrelapse survival in these patients are not known. In this study, we examined the outcomes of a single-center cohort of 60 patients with MM who experienced relapse or progression after alloHCT. In addition, we evaluated the use of salvage regimens for treatment of relapsed MM and analyzed the predictors for improved postrelapse survival. After a median follow-up of 2.2 years from the time of relapse, the median duration of postrelapse survival was 1.8 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 5.0 years). Patients received a median of 3 lines of therapy (range, 0 to 10) for treatment of MM beyond the post-alloHCT relapse/progression. Multivariate analysis identified cytogenetic risk (standard risk versus high risk; hazard ratio [HR], .34; P = .01), time to relapse after alloHCT (>12 months versus ≤12 months: HR, .41; P = .04), and occurrence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) before relapse (GVHD versus no GVHD: HR, 2.89; P = .01) significantly affected postrelapse survival. These data illustrate that long-term myeloma control and survival is attainable in those relapsing/progressing after alloHCT and suggest that the synergism between novel therapies and the allogeneic immune platform is the key to improved survival in this high-risk patient population.
许多多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者即使接受了异体造血细胞移植(alloHCT)的根治性治疗,最终仍会复发。在过去的十年中,随着新型疗法的出现,包括下一代蛋白酶体抑制剂、免疫调节剂和最近的单克隆抗体,MM 患者的治疗效果显著改善。尽管有几项已发表的研究评估了 alloHCT 治疗 MM 的结果,但关于 alloHCT 后 MM 患者疾病复发的生存结果的数据有限。此外,这些患者的复发后生存预测因素尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们检查了 60 例在 alloHCT 后复发或进展的 MM 患者的单中心队列的结果。此外,我们评估了挽救方案治疗复发 MM 的应用,并分析了改善复发后生存的预测因素。在从复发时间开始的中位 2.2 年的随访后,中位复发后生存时间为 1.8 年(95%置信区间[CI],1.2 至 5.0 年)。患者在 alloHCT 后复发/进展后接受了中位数为 3 线(范围为 0 至 10)的 MM 治疗。多变量分析确定细胞遗传学风险(标准风险与高风险;危险比[HR],0.34;P = 0.01)、alloHCT 后复发时间(>12 个月与≤12 个月:HR,0.41;P = 0.04)和复发前急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的发生(GVHD 与无 GVHD:HR,2.89;P = 0.01)显著影响复发后生存。这些数据表明,在 alloHCT 后复发/进展的患者中可以实现长期骨髓瘤控制和生存,并且新型疗法与同种异体免疫平台之间的协同作用是改善该高危患者人群生存的关键。