Suppr超能文献

近端指间关节背侧骨折脱位的切开复位内固定术

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Dorsal Fracture-dislocation of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint.

作者信息

Lee Jun-Ku, Kim Yoon Seok, Lee Jin-Hyun, Jang Gyu-Chol, Han Soo-Hong

机构信息

Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery.

Madi Hospital.

出版信息

Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2020 Feb;52(1):18-24. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-2668. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the clinical and radiological results of ORIF with inter-fragment screw or buttress plate fixation of acute PIP joint fracture dorsal dislocation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2007 to December 2016, nineteen patients - 14 men and 5 women with an average age of 40.9 (19 to 64) years - were included in this study; 9 patients underwent small sized interfragmentary screw fixation and 10 patients underwent small buttress plating. The average follow-up period was 45.1 (13 to 78) months. Clinical assessment included measurement of range of motion (ROM) of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joint (PIP, DIP), grip and pinch strength, and pain with use of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). At the postoperative X-ray, articular step off, gap, and degree of dorsal subluxation was measured, and maintenance of the reduction, fracture union, and the presence of degenerative changes were assessed.

RESULTS

All patients achieved solid unions without instability. The overall average range of motion of PIP joint were from 9° to 85° (10-83° in the screw group, 8-87° in the plate group without significant difference). However, the screw group (average: 53°) presented more flexion in the distal interphalangeal joint than the plate group (average: 34°). Plate fixation can cause limited DIP flexion. Six of the ten patients from the plate group, underwent implant removal and two of these patients required PIP joint arthrolysis due to the PIP flexion contracture of more than 30°. Three of the nine patients in screw group underwent implant removal and two of the three patients required PIP joint arthrolysis.

CONCLUSION

Mini plate and screw fixation of acute PIP joint fracture dorsal dislocation can achieve comparable favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes through stable fixation and early range of motion exercise. Screw fixation, if possible, is probably preferable to plate fixation because of better DIP joint ROM and lower incidence of hardware removal. If there is a need for plate fixation the use of a short plate is recommended to avoid joint stiffness.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查并比较切开复位内固定术(ORIF)联合骨折块间螺钉或支撑钢板固定治疗急性近端指间关节(PIP)骨折背侧脱位的临床和影像学结果。

患者与方法

2007年1月至2016年12月期间,本研究纳入了19例患者,其中男性14例,女性5例,平均年龄40.9岁(19至64岁);9例患者接受了小型骨折块间螺钉固定,10例患者接受了小型支撑钢板固定。平均随访时间为45.1个月(13至78个月)。临床评估包括测量近端和远端指间关节(PIP、DIP)的活动范围(ROM)、握力和捏力,以及使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛程度。术后X线检查时,测量关节台阶、间隙和背侧半脱位程度,并评估复位的维持情况、骨折愈合情况以及是否存在退行性改变。

结果

所有患者均实现了牢固愈合,无不稳定情况。PIP关节的总体平均活动范围为9°至85°(螺钉组为10 - 83°,钢板组为8 - 87°,无显著差异)。然而,螺钉组(平均:53°)的远端指间关节屈曲度比钢板组(平均:34°)更大。钢板固定可导致DIP关节屈曲受限。钢板组的10例患者中有6例进行了内固定物取出,其中2例患者因PIP关节屈曲挛缩超过30°而需要进行PIP关节松解术。螺钉组的9例患者中有3例进行了内固定物取出,其中3例患者中有2例需要进行PIP关节松解术。

结论

急性PIP关节骨折背侧脱位的微型钢板和螺钉固定通过稳定固定和早期活动范围锻炼可取得相当良好的临床和影像学结果。如果可能,螺钉固定可能比钢板固定更可取,因为其DIP关节活动度更好且内固定物取出率更低。如果需要进行钢板固定,建议使用短钢板以避免关节僵硬。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验