Kim Hye Jeong, Yoon Dae Young, Hong Ji Hyun, Yun Eun Joo, Baek Sora, Kim Eun Soo, Park Min Woo, Kwon Kee Hwan
Department of Radiology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Kangdong Seong-Sim Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Acta Radiol. 2020 Dec;61(12):1628-1635. doi: 10.1177/0284185120908137. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
Although uncommon, intra-parotid lymph node (IPLN) metastasis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of parotid masses in patients with head and neck cancers.
To compare the clinical and imaging features of IPLN metastases from head and neck cancers and simultaneous parotid primary tumors.
A retrospective review of 2199 patients with non-parotid head and neck cancers revealed 63 patients who also underwent parotidectomy during curative resection of head and neck cancer. After exclusion of direct extension to the parotid gland from adjacent primary tumors (n = 12) and IPLN metastases from skin cancer (n = 5), the final study group was composed of 46 patients, including 26 (1.2%) with 33 IPLN metastases and 20 (0.9%) with 24 simultaneous parotid primary tumors. We compared clinical features of patients (sex, age, site of primary tumor, histologic type, history of prior treatment for malignancy, TNM stages, side of parotid lesion, multiplicity, and metastasis in ipsilateral cervical LNs) and the CT (location in parotid gland, maximum dimension, margins, and central necrosis or cystic change) and 18F-FDG PET/CT (maximum standardized uptake value) findings.
Ipsilateral level II LN metastasis was more frequent in the IPLN metastasis group than in the simultaneous parotid primary tumor group (73.1% vs. 35.0%, < 0.05). Imaging features such as location in parotid gland, maximum dimension, margins, central necrosis or cystic change, and maximum standardized uptake value showed no significant differences between the two groups.
CT and PET/CT findings of IPLN metastasis are indistinguishable from simultaneous parotid primary tumor in patients with head and neck cancers.
尽管罕见,但头颈部癌症患者腮腺内淋巴结(IPLN)转移应纳入腮腺肿块鉴别诊断的考虑范围。
比较头颈部癌症IPLN转移与同期腮腺原发性肿瘤的临床和影像学特征。
对2199例非腮腺头颈部癌症患者进行回顾性研究,发现63例患者在头颈部癌症根治性切除术中也接受了腮腺切除术。排除相邻原发性肿瘤直接侵犯腮腺(n = 12)和皮肤癌的IPLN转移(n = 5)后,最终研究组由46例患者组成,其中26例(1.2%)有33处IPLN转移,20例(0.9%)有24处同期腮腺原发性肿瘤。我们比较了患者的临床特征(性别、年龄、原发性肿瘤部位、组织学类型、既往恶性肿瘤治疗史、TNM分期、腮腺病变侧、多发性以及同侧颈部淋巴结转移情况)以及CT(在腮腺内的位置、最大径、边缘以及中央坏死或囊性改变)和18F-FDG PET/CT(最大标准化摄取值)的表现。
IPLN转移组同侧II级淋巴结转移比同期腮腺原发性肿瘤组更常见(73.1%对35.0%,P<0.05)。两组在腮腺内位置、最大径、边缘、中央坏死或囊性改变以及最大标准化摄取值等影像学特征方面无显著差异。
头颈部癌症患者中,IPLN转移的CT和PET/CT表现与同期腮腺原发性肿瘤难以区分。