Suppr超能文献

局部应用氨甲环酸与局部应用羟甲唑啉喷雾剂治疗鼻出血时的止血数据。

Data on the hemostasis in epistaxis with Topically Administered TXA Versus Topical Oxymetazoline Spray.

作者信息

Whitworth Kristen, Johnson Jacob, Wisniewski Samuel, Schrader Meghan

机构信息

Lakeland Health, United States.

Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, United States.

出版信息

Data Brief. 2020 Feb 13;29:105283. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105283. eCollection 2020 Apr.

Abstract

The use of tranexamic acid (TXA) has recently gained popularity as a treatment modality for epistaxis in the emergency department. Data are presented on the efficacy of the topical use of the intravenous formulation of TXA versus the vasoconstrictor oxymetazoline applied topically in achieving hemostasis in patient presenting to the emergency department with anterior epistaxis. The original article "Comparative Effectiveness of Topically Administered TXA Versus Topical Oxymetazoline Spray for Achieving Hemostasis in Epistaxis" [1] provides complete interpretation of the data. The dataset regarding these treatment modalities has clinical significance toward preventing an avoidable need for escalation of treatment that could potentially increase patient discomfort and prolong emergency department throughput time.

摘要

氨甲环酸(TXA)作为急诊科鼻出血的一种治疗方式,近来受到广泛应用。本文呈现了静脉用TXA局部应用与局部应用血管收缩剂羟甲唑啉在急诊科前位鼻出血患者止血效果的数据对比。原文《局部应用TXA与局部应用羟甲唑啉喷雾剂治疗鼻出血的止血效果比较》[1]对这些数据进行了完整解读。关于这些治疗方式的数据集对于避免不必要的治疗升级具有临床意义,这种升级可能会增加患者不适并延长急诊科的就诊时间。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验